![]() |
|
Chapter 4 What’s in a Name?
You may think that it’s hard to be a truly original writer but it isn’t. It’s impossible. Ideas grow out of other ideas which, in turn, have someone else’s ideas attached to them. Some you share and some are personal. Your ears perk up when you hear your name. Your eyes take in more light when you see something or someone desirable. You pay extra attention when you see someone like yourself, someone who suffers what you fear, symbolizes what you hate or has what you wish you had.
Some of that is likely to show up in your writing whether you chose
to
Do you think, for instance, that all the similarities between Morbius and Altaira in Forbidden
Planet, and Shakespeare’s
Keep in mind the mirror that Mark Fuhrman wrote about in his book and all the opposites a mirror can stand for in a dream. Think of Lincoln’s dream of seeing two images of himself in a mirror, one clear and one faint. Keep in mind the pennies he saw on his eyelids as a corpse in a dream that confirmed the worst prophetic interpretation of his dream about the mirror. Keep in mind the white supremacy obsession of John Wilkes Booth, his violent hatred of “niggers” and the future he thought he was making for “the white race” by killing Lincoln. Think of what Fuhrman’s image assassination of O.J. Simpson did for Booth’s cause.
Think of the coins Mark Fuhrman found in Nicole’s garage to support his idea of a killer in a panic—one of which was a Lincoln
penny.
Think of the stories Fuhrman told his West Side bar buddies and his fellow
Police Protective League picnickers of
O.J.’s escalating violence toward
When I started looking for someone who could have framed O.J., it quickly became evident to me that if he existed, he had to have qualities most people associate with an obsessive-compulsive personality. The only person involved in the case that I knew about who fit that description was Mark Fuhrman. He also had the military background associated with silent double kills committed by one well-positioned man with two knives, and the mirrored blunt force injury above and to the rear of both victims’ ears. It struck me that only a man trained with a knife as a stunner as well as a slashing and stabbing weapon would think of using a knife in that way and have the presence of mind to do it. In the movie O.J. was making in which he slit someone’s throat, he was taught an entirely different silent kill technique. Two reasons I made these connections are because I can be a tad obsessive-compulsive myself and I learned a thing or two about silent kills in the Army. As an engineer attached to an infantry company in Vietnam for the first half of 1971 I often took the last place in line on various combat missions. That left me vulnerable to the kind of attack suffered by Ron and Nicole. When I saw the computer animation of the killer in action Vietnam was the first thing I thought of. The second thing I thought of was Basic Training where the Army taught me several silent kill methods, including the use of a knife to stun and to kill. I said to myself, he moves like a soldier! If the computer model was anywhere near accurate it meant that the killer had to think like a soldier. That meant he had to have practiced like one well in advance. It meant that most of the wounds to Ron and Nicole other than the ones a soldier would deliver as sure kills were put there to camouflage the nature of the assault, the killer’s real expertise and his true state of mind. Shortly after that eye-opening discovery, I learned that Mark Fuhrman had been a marine. He was, in fact, in training with the Marines the same year I was in combat with the Army. How could he not have known what I knew about silent kills…and how much sense does it make for the rage killing he attributed to O.J. to have been carried out in virtual silence? If Fuhrman was the killer, we had something else in common that answered the question of why the killings took so long. It’s called a combat high. Trust me, there is nothing in normal human experience to compare with it. To give you some idea of what an ecstatic experience it is, consider what Chuck Yeager said when he was asked about his most exciting experience. He didn’t say it was breaking the sound barrier in the X-15. It was aerial combat fought to the death in World War II. For some people a combat high can be as addictive as crack cocaine. The trouble is you have to expose yourself to life-treating challenges to achieve it, preferably against another human being…or two…or more. When I realized to my horror that I could have become a combat junkie if my whole unit hadn’t been returned to the States six months into my tour, I saw a lot of things differently. I saw how little separation there was between an ordinary man and a madman given the right genes to begin with and the right circumstances to put them in charge. I saw what it could do without a strong sense of moral obligation to keep it in check Perhaps a similar insight moved Robert Lewis Stevenson to write The Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde. Perhaps that’s why the writers of Forbidden Planet gave Morbius a murderous alter ego and why we were ready to believe on the strength of the shakiest evidence that O.J. had one, too. Perhaps that’s why it’s such an enduring dramatic theme. It touches a cord deep inside many of us…Some of us more than others.
Mark Fuhrman talked a lot about his love of danger. On the McKinney tapes he
In the ’56 version of The Bad Seed, Evelyn Varden (The
Night of the Hunter)
Monica loves murder mysteries and has a highly successful crime writer as a guest. She says, “he thrives on buckets of blood and sudden death.” Her tenant and friend, Christine Penmark, has an aversion to violence of any kind. To help her get at the root of her condition, Monica suggests that she listen to the writer’s account of an infamous serial killer—a practical nurse named Anderson who poisoned nine people—and “associate.” Christine asks her what she means. She says, “Just speak up because any idea that comes into your mind will be an associated idea.”
Anderson is associated with The Bad Seed and Forbidden Planet
only by way of
In the 1956 version of The Bad Seed, Rhoda Penmark takes her vitamins and tells her mother Christine, “I like the juice.” Those are a hell of a lot of name associations, not counting Chris, as in Christopher Reeve, as in Superman. More about “Chris” later. For now, we want to concentrate on the concept of free association as a gateway to the subconscious mind. In Tarzan’s Desert Adventure, Nancy Kelly plays a magician who is framed by a Nazi for murdering a man with a knife. Former LA Laker, Ervin Johnson who shared O.J.’s number 32 as a superstar in Mark Fuhrman’s favorite sport was better known as Magic Johnson. Magic is by that measure synonymous with the number 32.
In Alfred Hitchcock’s The Lady Vanishes, a magician attacks a
young man and
The lady who vanishes in The Lady Vanishes is
Free association is where the phrase “Freudian slip” comes from. It’s why Mark Fuhrman’s words and deeds associated with the Bundy Murders and the Juice, as he called O.J. in his book, are so revealing. We can link Mark Fuhrman to Mark Hamel’s Ted Bundy in The Deliberate Stranger because Fuhrman called the killing of Ron and Nicole “the Bundy murders” and made references to the crime that were a closer match to scenes from the movie than to the crime scenes. He called the bloody shoeprints on Bundy “footprints” twice. The only footprints to appear in Fuhrman’s Bundy killing scenario are in werewolf movies and in John McClane’s panicky flight from Hans in the 1988 classic blockbuster movie Die Hard (chapter 14). The name John is also meaningful in the context of free association when you factor in Mark Fuhrman’s sensitivity to his oedipal initials and his idea of O.J. being the reverse of what he appeared to be. Reversing the letters in O.J. you get the first two letters in John – the unique transformed into the common. You also get a logical transition to O.J. by way of John Walker the character that O.J. played in Capricorn I, and the “walker” on Bundy who left the bloody shoeprints. It’s hard not to make the connection between O.J. the walker on Bundy when you see him as a character in a wheelchair named Wheeler in No Place to Hide. Most Americans have three initials. Mark Fuhrman had two – the last two that any American male would want to be associated with. Orenthal James Simpson had three but he was known with admiration and respect all over the world by the first two. Freud would have had a field day with M.F.’s obsession with O.J.
Let’s not forget Mrs. Breedlove’s problem of “associating ideas with words and
names” and the words she extracted from the syllables of her husband Fred’s last
The notes Mark Fuhrman penned on Bundy were the neatest anyone had ever seen – as was the case with the letter and the post card scholars attributed to Jack the Ripper. Whoever the real Jack the Ripper was, he could have won a penmanship medal.
In the 1985 remake of The Bad Seed the
Look at this syllable by syllable the way Mrs. Breedlove would and see what you get when you combine the last syllable of Fuhrman’s name with other words and names that had special significance to him. Right away you get Gold and man as in Goldman. Brown, as in Nicole and Denise stands on its own. But when you combine Pen-man-ship with poison pen, (Fuhrman and Faye Resnick) Fuhrman and Ron Shipp (the spouse abuse and forgery expert who called Fuhrman at O.J.’s house the morning after the murders) you’ve got yourself some pretty good ingredients of a frame up. You’ve got all three victims (Goldman, Nicole and O.J.) and four of the five conspirators (Fuhrman, Resnick, Shipp and Denise) who would have been required to do what the evidence says O.J. and Nicole did. You heard Fuhrman’s theory about the coins that he discovered in Nicole’s garage and you saw the picture of the coins in the treasure chest where Blair Brown as Christine Penmark found Mark’s gold metal. You saw the photo with Mark Fuhrman’s hand near the bloody heel print of the killer. You know about his aspiration to be a writer and the book he wrote base on a real multiple murderer. But did you know that Christine Penmark took notes about a real multiple murderer under the pretext that she was writing a book about a murderer? Among other things she learned that the type of killer she had a deep, personal interest in could have started as a child and that person could “…present a more convincing picture of virtue than normal folk.” But such children had no sense of morality whatsoever. It was as though “they were born blind and you could never expect them to see.” Christine Penmark was played by the same actress who played the part on stage, Nancy Kelly. Mary Jane Kelly, who liked to be called Marie Janette, was Jack the Ripper’s last victim. Among other things, he cut her heart out. Perhaps you’ve noticed all the references in this chapter to the real Jack the Ripper and four of the five women he killed whose cases were investigated by Fred Aberline. Those you haven’t heard a lot about up till now you will be hearing a great deal about in the chapters to come. For now, you need only remember that Mary Ann Nichols was the first.
Jack Kelly as Lt. Farman, played the part of the odd man out in a
love triangle
In The Bad Seed (1956) you might recall Leroy telling Rhoda about a
“stick bloodhound”
that was going to find the bloody stick she hit the boy
Between the end of O.J.’s first trial and the start of his second one, Fuhrman
left That brings us back to Edward Morbius (called by his last name), Altaira Morbius (called by her first name) and Freud. When you factor in Forbidden Planet’s allusions to Greek mythology—where Shakespeare got some of his best ideas—Morbius’ relationship to Altaira takes on some heavy Freudian overtones. That, in turn, makes Morbius an ideal model for Othello, an older man enamored of a much younger woman driven by a savage, unreasoning beast within himself to kill the woman he loves. Loving father that we know Morbius is, makes him an even better model for the O.J. Simpson we are supposed to see as a split personality with an especially savage other self.
It’s a tough sell but the sheer weight of evidence causes him to pronounce sentence upon himself. “Guilty,” he cries. “My evil self is at the door and I have no power to stop it!”
|