From: Kariana
Date: 03 Apr 2000
Time: 12:23:28
Remote Name: ppp-199.mod.cableone.net
How do you know what we have or have not? You are the one to suddenly arrive. You spoke before of Jasper showing up now, so many years after the murder. You don't know enough about any of us, especially Jasper, to say this. We are not people who have just decided, gee lets look at the O.J. Simpson case. Especially not Jasper. We never stopped looking from the beginning. Nothing set right with any of us. Different things with different people. Just by working with these issues we have come up with a group of incredible possibilities. I am still looking because the actual murders took a huge turn when I found out about the lack of blood aspiration with Nicole. None of us totally agrees with the other. Most of us agree the police helped in some of this tampering. Especially Furhman's part in it. To whatever someone can make fit with the facts. Are you aware in Nicole's autopsy she has no blood aspiration of the trachea nor the lungs. This shows that Nicole was dead before the last slash that almost severed her neck. Then bled out of almost 90 percent of her blood. This took time. Someone psychology who enjoys playing with and displaying the bodies exactly as he wanted them seen. Ron Goldman thrown into the corner, as if garbage. The visual of the white woman sprawled in blood. In the beginning when I pointed out the blood stains on Larry Singleton's hands the last time he was arrested as proof that the killer would have had major blood stains, especially if the killer wore those gloves. They spoke of how the difference was that Larry Singleton reveled in the blood. So did this killer. Just in a different way, this person was into leaving messages and in a Professional manner. At least enough to do what they did and not leave much evidence except message clues, if exculpatory evidence was left out it was thrown out. Here in California this law was written which gave the Prosecution the descretion of what is and is not evidence. How convenient. Before name calling, perhaps you should check a few things out that didn't just show up in the media accounts. If you saw the trial yourself, then you should be asking questions of your own. If you simply believe that policemen don't lie then this is an easy case. The problem with this thinking is it has been proven that policemen do lie and in the LAPD. Within the last week the investigation in the LAPD went into other precincts including where Furhman came from. If they follow the money, they will find this goes very high into the LAPD. I just express my views here. It was a safe place where things can be written without fear of personal attacks and negative beliefs in each other's motives. I hope it stays this way. This is not the only board on this subject within this area of Smartfellows Press. You can see how far back this one goes. Most of us has been around one board or another, maybe a list or two, since the very beginning. Of course with the way it appears you think, you will believe I am lying. Something most people know I just don't do. :)
Karianaa