![]() |
|
|
Roads to "Bruno"
Who knows what Cybill Shepherd and Angela Lansbury where thinking when they agreed to star in the 1979 remake of Alfred Hitchcocks classic The Lady Vanishes without Hitchcock? I think I saw it once in the early 80s, but Im not sure and the tape is out of print so you cant buy or rent it. The only reason I think I remember it is because I can imagine Shepherd and Lansbury doing a marvelous job even if the movie sucked. Charlotte Rampling is another actress who leaves an impressionwhether or not you share the same birthday. In addition to being a fine actress she has a look about her that makes her a convincing player in a wide variety of roles. She has the perfect look for Laura Fischer in The Verdict (82) with Paul Newman, Roxanne Hart and James Mason as an attorney known as "The Prince of Darkness." She is the ideal Margaret Krusemark in Angel Heart (87) and Mrs. Fitzwaring in D.O.A. (88). Comparing that progression of roles to the roles Fuhrman assumed on his way to meeting Laura Hart and writing his best-seller gives you a strong indication that he watched those movies and got something out of them that he put to use. These are all core movies, like international airports that feeder airline routs from many points on the globe connect to. From these hubs you can trace the rout of Fuhrmans stories as well as his history of involvement with Laura Heart, the Simpsons and Cathy Randa. The birthday girl in The Birds (63) is Veronica Cartwright as Cathy. She and Angela Cartwright, who plays Penny in the TV series Lost in Space, are sisters. Like Fuhrman, Angela was born in 1952. Like Charlotte Rampling who shares the same birthday with Fuhrman, both of the Cartwright sisters were born in England. Notice how well suited the androgynous nickname for Veronica is to the blood of the male and female murder victims found in the Bronco. The nickname is Ronnie. In The Birds, Cathy has a birthday party thats
invaded by birds. In 1972, Barbara Hershey, whose birthday is the same as Fuhrmans,
changed her last Cathy Randa was O.J.s secretary on the morning of June 13, 1994 when Fuhrman trained his flashlight on the package in the Bronco for Orenthal Enterprises marked, "Attention Cathy." She had been his secretary since 1975 when Faye Dunaway starred as Cathy with Robert Redford as Joe Turner in Three Days of the Condor. Fuhrman was the only detective to identify her name on the package while distancing himself from knowledge of Orenthal Enterprises by calling it "O.J. Enterprises." The timing of Cathy Randas employment as O.J.s private
secretary to the release of Three Days of the Condor with Cathy in a Bronco is the
first direct The blood in the car that pulls out of the stable with Dex bound in the
rear Were not going to get into Native Son, but you can see
where the makers of D.O.A. (87) probably did whether they intended to
or not. In both screenplays (either version of Native Son and the 87 version
of D.O.A.) the beautiful daughter of a wealthy, attractive, philanthropic woman is That means the entire sequence of events was scripted like a screenplay. It means that the major players were scouted for their parts, that the sets and props were chosen for effect and that the main action was rehearsed before the film was shot in one take like Alfred Hitchcocks Rope. There is only so much rehearsing one can do for a high-profile double homicide. The Brett Cantor murder in July of 93 fills the bill nicely for some aspects of the 94 Bundy Drive investigation that could be worked out by Fuhrman only with a real police response in West LA. Look at the movie links to Brett Cantor and the Bundy murders by way of
Veronica Cartwright. She has a crewmate in Alien (79) named Ash (Sydney Ash
in Action Jackson, Madeline Ashton in Death Becomes Her). She has a crewmate
named Kane (People vs. Cain used to climb O.J.s Ashford wall), a black one
named Parker (the way O.J. parked his Bronco) and one named I dont have to remind you of Lisa Bonet in the leaky roof scene
of Angel Heart where water in the pitcher turns to blood. Any liquid in the right
context can stand With a spilt milk/blood link from Lisa killed by "the juice" to Lou + Cypher + Margaret, how can you not make the connection to Lou Cypher and Charlotte Rampling as Margaret Krusemark in Angel Heart? Did you notice how many literal and figurative blood links there are in the Fuhrman collection? Most of the Veronica Cartwright links are blood links of one kind or another. Through his two sons, Charlie Sheen and Emilio Estevez, Martin Sheen has blood links to Major League (89) and Loaded Weapon 1 (93) where cocaine is being distributed through "Wilderness Girls" cookies. Fronting the operation is Destiny Demeanor. Cathy Ireland is "Miss. Demeanor." She was Pat Corleys girlfriend the year before in Mr. Destiny. Look For Pat Corley again with Bruce Willis in Moonlighting. By the way, Bruce Willis and Allyce Beastly, another Moonlighting regular, play uncredited parts in Loaded Weapon 1. Loaded Weapon 1 is a spoof of action cop movies and
thrillers like Lethal Weapon, Cobra, and Basic Instinct. It is packed
with references to those films Just as a pizza in the Fuhrman collection is meaningless without a related death, the name Cathy means nothing without a reference to the package Fuhrman spotted in the rear of O.J.s Bronco with "Attention Cathy written" on it. In Basic Instinct, Catherine Tramell gets a ride to the police station in the back seat of Gus car. George Dzendza the German-born actor who plays the butcher in The Butchers Wife is Gus. In a twist on the scene with Nick and Gus on their way to giving
Catherine a lie detector test and the two that follow, Kathy Ireland in Loaded
Weapon 1 gets Before we move too far away from Cathy Irelands takeoff on Sharon Stone as Catherine Tramell, its probably a good idea to recall what Catherine told Nick and Gus about the relationship between writing and lying. She said, "Writing teaches you to lie You make stuff up, it has to be believable. Its called suspension of disbelief." Suspension of disbelief does not apply to satires like Loaded Weapon 1 where you see Kathy Ireland in Emilio Estevezs boots and him in her shoes without having to believe they did it by accident. Thats a literal depiction of what the Bundy killer did with Nicoles Bruno Magli pumps and his Bruno Magli boots. He even says, "We wear the same size pumps." Fuhrman and O.J. wore the same size bootsoften referred to as shoes. When you see Estevez as a composite of Sylvester Stallone in Cobra, Mel Gibson in Lethal Weapon, Clint Eastwood in Dirty Harry and Michael Douglas in Fatal Instinct, how do get away from Mark Fuhrmans screenplay? How do you get away from the "composite character" he said he was creating for himself on the Laura Heart McKinny tapes and his idea for a strong female protagonist doing a "mans job"? Figuratively speaking, thats a woman filling a mans shoes. To induce suspension of disbelief by creating a believable character, his task as a writer was to put himself in her shoes. Suspension of disbelief can go only so far. One of the best cinematic examples of what you can and cant do to tell a convincing story involves the decision to cast Angela Bassett as Tina Turneras opposed to Demi Moorein Whats Love Got To Do With It. Here was a great actress and dancer who bore a close enough physical resemblance to Tina for the audience to see her as Tina. The one big drawback was her body-builder physique. She had biceps and triceps that most men would envy. The idea that a short, frail-looking guy like the real Ike Turner could physically abuse someone who looked like Angela Bassett was a nonstarter. Had the producers not used a tall, powerful-looking actor like Laurence Fishburne who could be equally charming and menacing the movie would have flopped. Herein lies the secret of creating any successful illusion, including a
frame-up. The official story of O.J.-the-obsessed-killer tells us that his cut finger around the time that Ron and Nicole were stabbed to death was too much to accept as an unrelated event. Thats true. However, there is no evidence showing a greater likelihood that the connection was to O.J.s actions after the murders than to the killers actions after the cut. Indeed, if O.J. had cut himself too close to the time the killing was planned to begin (10:35) the killer would have had to work the cut into the evidence he intended to leave at Bundy and Rockingham. If he had to make a last-minute adjustment to the blood evidence he intended to leave behind, there were bound to be imperfections in that evidence or the stories that were supposed to account for it. The Aris gloves illustrate the point. Finding both gloves on Rockingham makes more sense than finding one of them on Bundy. The cap, the glasses, the nature of the victims wounds and the bloody shoeprints in O.J.s size and his ex-wifes brand were enough to tell a convincing story of O.J.s guilt. But a close examination of the blood drops O.J. deposited on his driveway would have confirmed his alibi and exposed the frame-up for what it was. Ergo, the real killer had to create a false blood trail from Bundy to Rockingham by planting blood and ideas. Explaining the blood of "O.J. the killer" from a cut on the finger of his left hand without a corresponding cut on the glove required that the glove come off. All of the evidence connected to O.J.s cut finger and Fuhrmans pointing finger in the official story is associated with gross anomalies. That part of the evidence fits neither O.J. as the killer fleeing in panic nor a killer out to frame him with the forethought to use Judithas glasses to make Goldman look like an unexpected visitor. The only way "O.J.s" blood does make sense on the Rockingham glove, the murder scene and the socks is as an improvisation to cover an unexpected addition of O.J.s blood to the physical evidence on Rockingham. Thats evidence that was out of the killers control. None of the evidence against O.J. that was out of the killers control makes sense with O.J. as the killer. It makes plenty of sense as a last-minute adjustment to an otherwise well planned and well executed murder/frame-up. You will recall that the glasses Ron Goldman was bringing to Nicole
were found in the street next to the curb. In order for Fuhrman to find the leather glove,
he Fuhrmans tale of the glasses brings Goldman to the murder scene though the sheer bad timing of delivering them while O.J. was attacking Nicole. That scenario was made necessary by the earwitnesses who heard a man say, "Hey! Hey! Hey!" followed by an argument between two men that couldnt be understood over the barking of the dogs. An impartial examination of that evidence tells you that the guy who said "Hey! Hey! Hey!" in "a clear voice" couldnt have been Ron Goldman. The man arguing with him couldnt have been O.J. Simpson. That leaves the killer and an accomplice entering the murder scene unexpectedly and a killing taking longer than it should have. And that leaves a startled killer afraid that his partner would leave a second set of bloody shoeprints. All of which creates a problem with the story of O.J. flying into a murderous rage after catching Ron with Nicole. Fuhrmans answer to that in Murder in Brentwood is his theory of Ron the unexpected witness to O.J. battering Nicole. The closer you look at that story the less sense it makes for a detective who pays close attention to detail, unless it was a story he was forced to tell by unanticipated events. Suppose O.J. had parked his Bronco on Ashford where he usually parked
it. Is there any way the limo driver could have missed it? The answer is no way. He This show is called "Gunfight at the So So Corral." It
features Pat Corely as For the wet shoeprints you can refer to half a dozen movies in the
Fuhrman collection. For the blood trial, all you need is the scene in Loaded Weapon
1 This scenario fits the method of operation Fuhrman boasted of using when he told Laura Hart in 1985 about his arrests of people on bogus charges then manufacturing the evidence to fit his story. The example he gave involved a simple way of using his victims blood evidence to match his lie before the victim had a chance tell anyone the truth. He said that he would bust a junkie on trumped-up charges then tear open a scab on his arm and claim that the fresh bleeding is what caught his attention and led to the arrest. Everyone would see the bleeding and assume that the junkies ridiculous story about a cop known for paying close attention to details like that had to be a lie. Everyone knows that junkies are liars and everyone expects them to lie about the arresting cop when they get caught. The trick, of course, is to tell a lie that matches peoples expectations of what the truth is most likely to be in a given situation. If you can create the right circumstances you can let those circumstances do most of the lying for you by preparing your target audience to accept what you have to say as long as its consistent with what they already believe. Most people accept Fuhrmans story of meeting Laura Hart by chance
in February of 1985. But there are several things wrong with his story that are more
consistent with the fictitious Laura Fischers "chance" meeting with
Frank Galvin Thorough research and meticulous planning are hallmarks of Fuhrmans approach to every big move he made in his police career. It would have been out of character of him not to research and plan his next move if his disability claim had been successful. Indeed, he must have had something in mind when he went through all of the trouble he did to get his disability pension on a fraudulent claim. He said in his book that he was a big fan of Joseph Wambaugh, the cop-turned-novelist and screenwriter that he said he was trying to emulate with the composite character he created on the McKinney tapes. At the time she started the tapes she was Laura Hart. She and Fuhrman agree that she was sitting alone in an outdoor café when Fuhrman approached her and struck up a conversation that led to their agreement to work together on a screenplay. Fuhrman said that their relationship also involves an intimate affair. The way she stumbled over the question in court suggests that that much of Fuhrmans account was true. In Sidney Lumets The Verdict, Paul Newman is an alcoholic looser of an attorney named Frank Galvin who gets a chance at redemption when a friend tosses him a case of malpractice. The defendants are two prominent surgeons and the Archdiocese of Boston, which runs St. Catherines the hospital where a botched surgical procedure results in the patients brain death. Galvin has a good case that he is sure he can win even against Edward J. Concannon, a.k.a. "The Prince of Darkness." Concannon is the most ruthless and successful attorney in Boston. Galvin doesnt know that Laura, the attractive woman sitting alone at the bar he frequents was carefully selected by Concannon to be appealing to him. Her job is to win his trust and learn his secrets so Concannon can counter his moves before he can make them. Concannon is paying Laura for the part she is asked to play, but
the big payoff she expects is a position with his firm that will put her back in the big
time. She The name Roxanne Hart meant nothing to me until 1987 when I saw her with Ed Harris, Bruce McGill and Robert Lesser on HBO television as Jenny in The Last Innocent Man. A young Ed Harris with a full head of hair is the pathologist with bloody gloves in Coma (71) who jokes about keeping his wife in line with his knowledge of how to get away with murder. Bruce McGill (BM as in Bruno Magli) is the private eye in The Last Boy Scout (91) who gets caught having an affair with Bruce Willis wife Sara. Robert Lester is the man on the airplane in Die Hard (88) who gives Bruce Willis the advise about taking his shoes and socks off and walking around barefoot on the rug making fists with his toes. In The Last Innocent Man, Roxanne Hart as Jenny is
at a party given by a famous writer named Jonathan Gault. Ed Harris, as attorney Harry
Nash, has It was on the Laura Hart McKinney tapes that Fuhrman said, "Im the key witness in the biggest case of the century. And if I go down they lose the case. The glove is everything. Without the glovebye, bye." Roxanne Hart looked awfully familiar to me in The Last Innocent Man, but that was it. Before then (1987) I could not have connected her name with her face on a bet. If Fuhrman was unable to make the connection between the fictitious Laura Fischer and the real Roxanne Hart before February 1985 the name of screenwriter Laura Hart has to be a genuine coincidence. But given Fuhrmans history of compound "coincidences" as stepping stones in his writing career and his timely involvement in O.J. Simpsons life, coincidence seems like the least likely explanation. Where Charlotte Ramplings "Laura" in The Verdict comes together with a memorable screenplay appearance by Roxanne Hart is in the 1983 made-for-television movie Special Bulletin. Thats the very next thing Hart appeared in after The Verdict in 1982. It was 1983 version of what Orson Wells did on radio in 1938 with H.G. Wells classic War of the Worlds. Note the transposition of 38 and 83, a play on how George Orwell named his futuristic sci-fi classic 1984 He finished writing it in 1948. Special Bulletin proved once again how difficult it is for some people to separate a legitimate news report from a staged performance if you give the performance the a news look and sound of news that people are familiar with. Instead of Martians landing in Grovers Mills, New Jersey, Special Bulletin has terrorists with an atomic bomb treating to blow up Charlotte, North Carolina. The finer you draw the line between fact and fiction, the harder it is for more and more people to see the truth. I was one of the people initially fooled by Special Bulletin because of the circumstances under which I saw it. I don't know why I had my TV tuned to whatever station it was on, but I was busy with something else and not paying much attention. The first thing that got my attention was the announcement of a special bulletin by somebody who looked and sounded like a network news anchor. I didnt know who he was, but I figured he could have been a new guy. I didnt notice the phony network because I thought I knew what network I was watching. I didnt know any of the actors so I didnt know they were acting until I started noticing something peculiar about the way some of the people on "live" camera were talking. People who should have been cussin like troopers were using language suitable for "all audiences." Then I started noticing other little tings that didnt look or feel quite right until it slowly dawned on me that I had been had. Once I began to question the reality of what I was seeing the more obvious the act became. If I saw it again I could probably tell you the point at which I started to see the light. Im pretty sure it was at least ten minutes. What was embarrassing then, was the fact that I didnt see the clues that were staring me in the fact all along. That was the feeling I got when I was watching the O.J. case, thinking from the evidence presented by the prosecution, that O.J. had to be guilty, and it suddenly hit me that Id seen all of the evidence somewhere else. Some of it Id seen in the Army in a course on silent kills but most of it came straight from the movies, only cobbled together like spoof of more movies than I could name. Starting with the knit cap the killer left on Bundy I found a chain of movies that eventually led here. It turns out that anywhere I started in the Fuhrman collection would
have eventually lead to Bruce Willis. He appears in Loaded Weapon 1 dressed
as he
|
Contact the author: Jasper Garrison
Send comments/suggestions
to Webmaster, Charles R. Alexander
Copyright © 1999 Smartfellows Press