![]() |
|
Introduction
| The
Smoking Gun is a companion book to Iago in Brentwood: How Mark Fuhrman Got
Away With Murder. Iago gets its title from the character by that name in
Shakespeares play Othello. Shakespeares Iago engineers the downfall of
Othello by contriving incriminating circumstantial evidence of infidelity against
Othellos wife Desdemona with Othellos chief lieutenant Casio. Iagos
resemblance to Mark Fuhrman was striking, particularly his talent for giving innocent
facts an incriminating spin
. Iago to Othello as they see Casio leaving Desdemona: "Was
that Casio that he would sneak away so guilty-like knowing you were coming?" Fuhrman to defense attorney Uelmen: "The vehicle was carelessly, haphazardly
parked
. The rear end was jutting out into the street several inches, if not maybe a
foot farther than the front
." Under the accumulated weight of suggestions like Casios "guilty-like"
exit, everything Casio said and did with respect to Desdemona made him look like the man
Iago described. All of the evidence that Casio and Desdemona were having an affair could
be traced to Iago. Likewise Fuhrmans "guilty-like" interpretation of how
O.J. parked his Bronco. There was nothing unusual about it. Where you will see a lot of
cars parked at incriminating angles like the one he described is in the movies. The appearance of guilt is an essential component of a frame-up. But because a frame-up
is an illusion, it must also have essential characteristics of an illusion like distorted
angles of observation combined with the power of suggestion to get people to see things
that arent there. It would require carefully arranged props, duplicates, the means
to switch one look-alike item for the other, "invisible" confederates, etc.
Every bit of physical and circumstantial evidence against O.J. showing the literal or
figurative hand of Mark Fuhrman has those characteristics. So do the movies. What were talking about here is a list of objects, names, circumstances and
scenarios associated primarily with Mark Fuhrman that correlate strikingly with objects,
names, circumstances and scenarios in the movies. Were not talking about anything as
general as someone parking at an extreme angle to the curb, a killer wearing leather
gloves or a blonde female picking up a butcher knife in a kitchen to protect herself from a
man. Were talking about large clusters of these things in movie after movie in an
unbroken series of connections like brain cells talking to each otherexactly like
brain cells talking to each otherwith scattered bits of information joined by a
network of common bonds. Obviously my brain cells were involved in finding the links that I found. My brain
cells configured by nature and by nurture in the military and in the world of professional
design, told me that Nicoles body and someone with training in artistic composition
carefully arranged the objects in the photo at Ron Goldmans feet. I knew that the
killer had military training, practice, and backup plans for every foreseeable
contingency. I knew that he improvised when something happened that he could not have
anticipated. I knew that he enjoyed his grisly work. I knew that he had multiple reasons
for everything he did and multiple explanations for everything that didnt add up. I
knew that he placed Nicoles body on her side the way actors fall in movies to
keep from getting hurt. In Murder in Brentwood Fuhrman said, "Vary rarely do you find a smoking
gun
." He said witnesses often tell stories that are weak, confused or
contradictory. He said that enough circumstantial evidence, on the other hand, could tell
you what must be the truth. I agree. You are about to see a star-studied universe of
circumstantial evidence.
|
|
Contact the author: Jasper Garrison
Send comments/suggestions
to Webmaster, Charles R. Alexander
Copyright © 1999 Smartfellows Press