[ Home | Contents | Search | Post | Reply | Next | Previous | Up ]
From: Goldmine
Date: 1/1/03
Time: 1:10:26 AM
Remote Name: 66.72.161.43
I was hoping to see more posts hear on Fuhrman’s movie. It’s a goldmine of information that proves in a hundred different ways that my Smoking Gun thesis was dead on target. The name links are there. The “Scrabble game” with the names and initials are there. Whoever did the actual writing and staging of the movie must have seen the same things I did because they’re ALL there, from the crucifix to the spotted necktie – all of which Fuhrman had to approve.
I’ve been working my butt off to pull it together in a way that won’t amount to anther book but there is so much in the movie that paring it down is a monumental chore. The Ford book I’m writing is also taking up a great deal of time. There are forces at work that make it necessary to put that number one in my priorities. I haven’t forgotten about the new map and photos that Rose sent to me. That, too, has to wait.
One thing I know for sure is that Fuhrman was wrong about Michel Skakel. He didn’t do it. It was not a rage killing and Michel really did have an alibi. The key is the missing golf clubs.
Fuhrman did not mention in his book or in the movie that ALL of the Toney Penna irons except for the one that the Greenwich detectives found in the Skakel home were missing. The one they found was not a 5-iron, as Fuhrman claimed in his book. It was a 4-iron. It was not found in a golf bag as it shows in the movie or in a storage bin as Fuhrman says in his book. It was fond in an umbrella rack.
The 6-iron wasn’t necessarily the murder weapon. I think it was the 5-iron. I think the 6-iron with the broken pieces were broken by hand (with gloves, of course) and planted to make it look like the murder weapon. I think that Fuhrman studied the case and reached the same conclusion before the Bundy murders. I would not rule out the possibility that he murdered the witness who supposedly died of a drug overdose until I see whether or not he had a real alibi. His testimony is too important to Fuhrman's case and too convenient.
Fuhrman monkeyed with the time of death in his book and his movie to give Ken Littleton an alibi that he didn’t have. And yes, the barking dogs – and the lack of barking dogs when Fhurman claims the murders occurred – do matter.
In the book and in the movie Fuhrman makes a point of saying that the witnesses claimed that they heard barking dogs between 9:30 and 9:50. He says that the Skakel’s nanny asked Littleton to check on the noise a little after 9:30, which gives Littleton an alibi if the murders where committed when the dogs started “going crazy.” However, the witnesses said that they heard the dogs wigging out at 9:50, when Littleton was supposedly alone in his room unpacking his bags and watching The French Connection (remember how big I said that was in The Smoking Gun?).
Littleton was drunk that night. He was also a compulsive petty thief. I think that Martha caught him stealing the clubs. She threatened to tell and he killed her. --Jasper