[ Home | Contents | Search | Post | Reply | Next | Previous | Up ]
From: charlie
Date: 9/11/03
Time: 8:10:40 AM
Remote Name: 209.240.198.63
Think of this guys. The ring UNDER Ron's body was only casually ID'd in court. I don't think that Kim ID'd it but I may be wrong about that.
The best I can remember is that Cochran "stated" in a question to Lange that it was ID'd by Fred Goldman--Isn't that right? And I believe Lange came back with one of his "I think so" answers. Not an absolute yes.
I'd like to remind you too that Goldman was not even allowed by his lawyer to answer whether Ron' watch was returned. He answered No and then the lawyer said, Don't answer that. He did not answer what of Ron's was returned by the coroner or the Cops.
That ring would fall into that category.. As would the watch, the ID, the keys, etc.
Recall that depo is how we learned of TWO sets of keys. Only one set of keys were discussed in the criminal trial or elsewhere. Only ONE set of keys were ever ID'd in court. And in Evidence Dismissed, it says a set of 5 keys was found--all of which Fred Goldman could ID in the depo--none of which were ANY keys to the borrowed car.
A LOT of the evidence, etc. surrounding Ron is a mystery from his so-called driver's license (which Kim said he didn't have but had a CA ID) to the watch (that he allegedly was never w/out) to the keys, to the ring and more.
As to the ring being UNDER the body, it seems to me that it was one of the things that SHOULD have been officially ID'd as it could have belonged to the killer and not either one of the victims.
charlie