[ Home | Contents | Search | Post | Reply | Next | Previous | Up ]
From: Jasper
Date: 8/29/03
Time: 10:30:38 AM
Remote Name: 68.73.199.242
Charlie,
Yes! It’s like a jigsaw puzzle with a lot of missing peaces surrounded by pieces that are in place. You how the shapes of the missing pieces and you can draw reasonably accurate pictures of what has to be on them.
Anyone who has followed the criminal investigation and the trials as closely as we have will notice gaps in the evidence that shouldn’t be there. If they were random and inconsequential it wouldn’t prove anything. But they appear again and again at crucial points where no significant gaps should be. Most of those ommissions had to be deliberate.
You should not be able to draw in a coherent picture of systematic deception with information that isn’t there. You shouldn’t be able to link that missing information, and in MANY cases, missing evidence, to so few people again and again when and where they had to be to make it disappear. The fact that you can only make sense of what you have in these instances by filling in the blanks with these people involved in a coordinated effort to hide guilty knowledge about one thing or another PROVES the effort and their involvement. --Jasper