[ Home | Contents | Search | Post | Reply | Next | Previous | Up ]
From: Miss Marple
Date: 8/14/03
Time: 2:43:03 PM
Remote Name: 24.80.71.75
Jasper,
I have been puzzled by that triangle too, Scull, Flammer and McElroy. It's an impossibility that not all sports photographers in the country looked through their arcives to see if they had a picture of O.J. and the BMs. In the transcripts you get the impression that it was McElroy who discovered first Scull's photo and then Flammer's. McElroy wasn't even a sports photographer. Could it be that he somehow got hold of the sign in sheet for the game, (the one that disappeared) and contacted those who were there. Both Scull and Flammer said that McElroy offered his services as their agent, not the other way around.
Scull didn't contact the prosecution in 95. He did contact the Enquirer (testimony) in June of 1995, trying to sell his picture. They were not interested, "OJ-ed out", if you can believe that. So the picture lay dormant till McCelroy showed up in March of 1996. He had possesion of the negative for some six weeks, during which time he first sold it to the Enquierer and then had it travel to London, England to Gamma Liason's head office. This I believe is a rather sophisticated photo lab also. McElroy flew to New York to pick up the parcel when it came back on the Concorde.
Flammer's story is even worse. Isn't this all a little too much? Neither the prosecution nor Kellie had yet been contacted or I think considered. At that time I had seen a picture of O.J. playing golf with fuhrman in the Enquierer!!! So that rag doesn't seem to take things like that so seriously.
I did a google on McElroy and he seems to be doing OK for himself. He is a dealer in photo equipment and a freelance photographer still. No sports. An interesting picture came up, copyrighted to him. On the Time web site on the civil trial there is a picture of a pair of Bruno Maglis, from 1996. No O.J., just the shoes.
Miss Marple