[ Contents | Search | Post | Reply | Next | Previous | Up ]
From: charlie
Date: 6/5/03
Time: 8:02:20 AM
Remote User:
Rose is correct about the newsletter. It was more than strange that nobody came forward with having one when thousands go out and many "fans" save such things.
But say that it was just long enough to have thrown them away even though fans save those things for years. Another quirky part of the newsletter/photo/ shoes deal is that nobody in the stands on a special day with recognitions and "star" visitors had a photo that they had taken showing the shoes. Or at least they didn't come forward with it.
The only other photos were photos sent to England first to be processed in a special lab known for teaching how to doctor photos.
And like you, Rose, and the house across the street from Fuhrman---there are many things I would like to know about Fuhrman if I could. Knowing more about the possibility that the residents of Brentwood who came forward (and were promptly sued by Furhman) to say that they had seen Fuhrman with Nicole several times that spring in Brentwood were in fact telling the truth.
THat is one of the big "ifs" in this case --to know just how well Furhman in fact did know Nicole.
And the same sort of thing could be said about Kato. In the trial, it was downplayed but Kato knew most if not all of these people as well--like the people at the Mezzaluna, Faye, and others. Possibly Ron Shipp was known to him as well.
So, I would say knowing MORE about Kato and Fuhrman and their dealings would be important.
John, I am quite sure that many in the group of friends and acquintances and neighbors would have knowledge about Kato using the Bronco. He perhaps picked up the kids at school, brought them back and forth from Nic's to OJ's and back and more. Some of this was seen by neighbors, teachers, other kid's parents and more.
And the BIG question may be was Kato known to Fuhrman prior to the murders and vice versa?
charlie