[ Home | Contents | Search ]
Time: 4:11:28 PM
To me, some of Celeni's comments actually fit much better (or at least do not conflict with) your conclusions in IAGO (and other evidence)than you apparently think. Note the following:
Lange: His reference to Lange was the detective, not the neighbor evidenced by the reference to Lange in the section on "operation Lasso".
The Bronco: I think Bosco reported that the neighbor Lange worked for FORD or knew these cars well but couldn't confirm it was a Bronco. One ref. said it was a Bronco but this model didn't have a tire well,therefore Lange couldn't be sure.
The People. Per Lange the neighbor, there were four in sight, the person who "hugged" the blonde and three others. Also per the neighbor, the blonde had on a white robe or dress. Same with the Celeni.
Bruno Maglis: The prints heading toward the back gate could've been either of the two with the consistent sizes (MF or Lange. The point at which the prints stop and turn back could've been the point at which someone viciously slashed Nicole's neck, perhaps because she was not yet dead. That person could've then left from the front.Perhaps that was the point that someone (one of there's said : "Hey!, Hey! and argued with fellow perpetrator.
Next two cars were witnessed, one leaving from the back and one leaving from the front.
None of this conflicts with your theory.
The Struggle. If one person was just holding Nicole, two others and Goldman could've been on the only persons struggling. In this case, your two knives theory also jibes.
The Dog. Stuck in the middle gate area until someone slammed the middle gate shut?
At Rockingham: Perhaps parks saw two men about the same height within a few seconds of each other? Someone over the fence, then a few seconds later, OJ near his drive? Perhaps the three thumps were a sign to the fence jumper that he should not proceed? Perhaps after seeing O.J. opening the door or noticed Parks at the gate.
Although my knowledge of the case is a smithers of yours, in all, I don't see the conflicts with your theory that you may have.
What the super-camera saw was of course not all possible. But in recall, perhaps some first-hand facts with some memory of the video meshed and came out in the interview?