Home | Contents | Search Iago Conspirators Timeline Junot
From: Kari
Date: 2/16/02
Time: 1:59:39 PM
This is where the Jill issue gets all messed up in personalities and leaves rational thought every time. It isn't about Jill Shively, whether I believe her or not. It is about not telling the truth in Grand Jury, not telling the truth about the time of when she says she saw the SUV because Marcia told her not to is wrong. If the question are asked wrong, say, I don't understand. I believe she was probably tongue tied about what to say, but had she revealed Marcia Clark for making her say something different than the truth in the Grand Jury room Marcia Clark would have been removed. This isn't about me saying someone else should have could have would have. It is about right and wrong. Allowing a prosecutor to try a case when you know she is lying is immoral. It is wrong. I find this one act as making her not credible. This is different than saying she is a liar. She may have been a witness to an event that could have changed many things. She was told to lie to the Grand Jury by the Prosecutor, having made this public may have gone down as sour grapes but it would have gotten Clark off this case which is what this case needed desperately. When you hear Rockne Harmon speak of some of Marcia's games and how he was never told that indeed EDTA was found on the back gate, on the socks, etc... until the Defense put Rieders on the stand this shows you the kind of games she was playing. Ruin your life so I don't have to work anymore unless it is on television. It sounds like a good game show doesn't it? Ruin your life. Look at all the bodies Marcia left in her wake. Jill had the opportunity to destroy her railroad train and she let it go and yet still tries to get people to believe her about what she saw, it is all Marcias fault because she told her to say this and that. Now does Jill Shively strike you as a person who'd keep quiet about an injustice done to her by a Prosecutor who was allegedly leading a team of prosecutors to make a case against O.J. Simpson?