From: Prien
Date: 22 Oct 2010
Time: 11:54:38 PM
And the DA knew it, as well as the lab personnel who wrote they searched the socks but no blood was obvious. That was neiter a denial nor an affirmation, and perfect for ensuring blood could be planted o the socks after they did their inventory whe they could not declare there was blood on socks that wasn't there without really blowing the frame-up if the defense demanded a split of the blood on the socks, which is why they were examining them. Look at Clark attacking the defense conspiracy theory based on why the police would pick up clean socks. It's so they had an obect from OJ on which it copuld later bne planted. That was so obvious.The blood found on the socks and the jury rolling their eyes while Kestler testified and tried to explain her failure to take noters and lack of memory about just about everything that almost certainly led each juror to conclude with certainty it was a frame-up. The socks were the last nail in their coffin. It's the lab personnel's equivocal finsings about the bloodless socks that proves to a certainty this was a high level conspiracy. Prien