From: Rudy
Date: 10 Oct 2010
Time: 01:53:39 PM
Thank you for the considerate, intelligent reply, I thought I had blown it, this case can be very frustrating for me at times as well as you yourselves I'm sure. Especially of late the board seems to have gone insane and I didn't help. Yes, I have watched the animations several times and read the accompanying text, they show OJ bleeding walking around his property. The reason I said item #6, The Rockingham driveway blood drop was planted isn't because I just made it up to be contentious, the reason I said it is because of what Doctor Lee says in the link to the relevant transcript that Jasper provided on the matter. Did you realize the Rockingham driveway blood drop, item 6 has a wet transfer on the envelope it was in, that the bindles are no longer initialed, do you realize what that likely means? It means the wet transfer most likely isn't from the original Rockingham drive blood sample. Why is that, why remove the original dried sample and replace it with what proved to be OJs wet blood, why do that? You need to address this wet transfer issue because it is most consistent with the old dirty trick of a dirty cop planting his own blood to get a warrant then covering his tracks in the lab and it is inconsistent with OJ making that drop himself. Certainly Dr Lee finds it disturbing, he suggests it was planted, how else do you explain the wet transfer from previously dried swatches as testified to by both criminalists. Sorry, but the animations, which I can appreciate took alot of time and hard work, don't explain the wet transfer.----------------------------------------- What I have been saying all along is the killers DNA is in Nicole's blood pool, it is item #29 the 4 allele, it could possibly even be on the fingernail scrapings. That is what the big deal is about with my recent dna post. If you read the proceedings from the transcripts they are discussing the mysterious 4 allele, typing results from item 42, Nicole's blood pool, and the Prosecution withholding DNA exemplars of the investigating officers- exculpatory evidence. Why are these items all bunched together for discussion. The DNA results weren't shouted out from the rooftops, as a matter of fact it was gagged, obviously they have done a great job at keeping it hidden but with some searching one can see the DA is going to great lengths to hide Fuhrman's DNA as well as the results from item 42, Nicole's blood pool, from the Defense. Nothing can nail the killer like his own DNA at the crime scene and no one can convince me they don't know who did it, however I'd rather not talk about it anymore for several reasons. The reason I posted about the big blood stain on Nicole's dress going directly to the FBI is because it could have the killers blood on it, consistent with Henry Lee's claim the killers blood was on her back as well. It seems odd a giant blood pool like item 42 would come back "inconclusive" for DNA the Defense thought it was odd and was demanding the true results at the end of the trial along with the DNA of the investigating officers.