From: Jasper
Date: 07 Oct 2010
Time: 05:19:12 PM
Angel – Perhaps you missed my first message to you because it wasn’t there when you were composing your reply to Bobsnhawaii. My first word to you was, “Welcome.” ......................................................................................................................... It appears that you hadn’t read Rovaan’s first (I hope it isn’t the last) message to you, either. Maybe you did after you made your second post and you are taking the time to research and think about what she wrote. I hope that’s the case. ........................................................................................................................ As for the assumptions you made (and implied) that tipped Bobsnhawaii over the edge, you might want to take another look at what you wrote: “After reading some latest post's to Prien from Rovaan I notice a pattern of whenever he states his views that their was a conspiracy but Fuhrman was only a small part of it, he is blasted for not going along with the Fuhrman only theory.” ................................................................................................................. Somehow you missed Prien’s pattern of posting every time someone new comes to the board. You even adopted HIS misleading version of MY Iago hypotheses. You did this clearly without a clue about what the Iago hypothesis is and how it evolved from a logic exercise to a theory with theoretical people, to a testable proposition (the hypothesis) that matched those theoretical people to real ones. ........................................................................................................................ Somehow you missed the fact that your ability to find this site the way you did and post here without having to register is owed 100 % to the incredibly hard work and long ours devoted to those tasks by Rovaan. Instead, you attacked her, Bobsnhawaii, Lollie and me for “blasting Prien BECAUSE he does not go along with “the Fuhrman only theory” that PRIEN invented. You assumed we were blasting him for the stupid reason he has been repeating ON THIS SITE for many years while treating the tons of objective evidence that says otherwise as if it didn’t exist. ........................................................................................................................ What will it take to get you to see that Prien’s only interest in using our boards is to win converts to his theories, not to test them against the empirical facts that some of us are on the constant lookout for to tell us if we are right – or wrong? ........................................................................................................................... Prien has done a lot of work to promote his massive-conspiracy-from-the-top theory on OUR site using our resources with easy access to competing points of view. But did you know that you ultimately need “cured dog paws” to make his theory work http://www.smartfellowspress.com/_Iago2007/_0807/0000005d.htm http://smartfellowspress.com/_Iago2008/_1208/00000172.htm Ask him what Solitarie1 and I were referring to with his “cured dog paws” theory. Better still, research it yourself and let the facts speak to you for themselves. As for Fuhrman’s reach; it was vastly greater than you would think by his job title. You have a lot of homework to do. –Jasper