From: rudy
Date: 09 Jun 2010
Time: 05:21:37 AM
You bring up some great points that, like a judges order, influence the way evidence is interpreted.- especially the viewpoint of "look at how smart I am"- Who is the lone officer, the one who stands out loud and clear shouting "look at me! look at me!" When looking at the crime scene photos of "him" beside the Bronco, pointing at the glove, et cetera from the "look at me" perspective appear to be a seriously disturbed psycho who was pathologically desperate for attention, posing for his own twisted glory rather than honestly and diligently trying to solve a crime. Something else I just realized was how many people who don't particularly trust the police or who generally dislike the police, not necessarily criminals, but you know the type, all of a sudden they believe everything the police say in the Simpson case and won't even consider Simpson is innocent. Could it be because the one detective that "solved" the case was a rebel, a Clint Eastwood type that broke the "stupid rules" and solved the case? These same people who don't like the police didn't think it was any big deal when protocols were outright violated, when the LA crime lab was run more like a bootleg distillery, when the evidence was tampered with, when the coroner wasn't called, etc. on and on, defending the corrupt LAPD practices while giving the finger to the cop car on the side of the highway that might nail them for speeding.