From: Prien@aol.com (with corrected typos)
Date: 26 Dec 2009
Time: 11:36:32 AM
You said it a nutshell - you didn't think you had ever previously written that the murders "were committed 'for the purpose of framing OJ.'" That was precisely the new point you made, but this is one I have been making for years as I said it repeatedly to this group as well as on the Simpson ng since at least 2000....Of course OJ was framed. If you came to the conclusion in 1998 when you first posted about the frame-up on line, then you are a Johnny come lately to that conclusion because I and many others were saying that right after the murders, and proJs were posting it to the Simpson ng during the trial. Indeed, I began a manuscript on it with the point of view in 1996 that I have completely revised once the transcripts became available to me and it became obvious the murders were, indeed, committed for the "purpose of framing OJ." Which is a vastly different concept than saying someone framed Simpson for the murders that just happened to have been committed for reasons unknown. That was your hypothesis, but one I discarded ages ago, whatever your book blurb says about the killer being in the best position to frame OJ....Even this is wrong, because the fact is, that the frame up never occurred at the crime scene, as you seem to imagine, but at the crime lab, a point Chris Springer made ages ago. In point of fact, if you imagine the evidence framing OJ was planted by Fuhrman at the crime scene as part of the murder and planned frame up, then you really have no clue how he was framed. The fact is that unless and until you can show how Fuhrman acquired the objects and blood necessary to plant the evidenced that was most incriminating, and by that I mean obtaining OJs and the victims' blood to plants it (impossible for him to have had it before the murders, so impossible for him to have planted it at the murder site), and how he acquired the Simpson and Nicole blood samples to plant on the socks to which he had no access until after they were recovered, and on which no blood was observed until August, you're claim that you anticipated all this in your framing hypothesis is pure hog wash....And finally, that Fuhrman committed both murders for the purpose of framing Simpson as an act of self-promotion is ludicrous beyond belief. To show how ludicrous, let's go straight to Griffin's mantra denouncing the frame up hypothesis on the Simpson ng: "How could Fuhrman (or any cop) have dared to commit the murders at whatever time they happened without knowing in advance that Simpson would have no iron-clad alibi at exactly that time that would fully expose the frame-up? And how could he even have imagined that the entire media would instantly join the lynch mob to get Simpson rather than taking a good hard look at and ridiculing the evidence the prosecution acquired. A couple of hints about how easily the whole project could have been derailed. The CA highway department had continuous real time data on traffic flow on the 405 that fixed its speed all along the route the Brown traveled, as well as the number of cars in each lane. Any reporter could have FOILED that data that would have undoubtedly established that traffic was slowed to a crawl at the five or six major interchanges along that route that would have proved beyond doubt the Browns could not have made the drive in the 60 minutes they had according to the story for Juditha to be making any phone call at 9:37 from her house. End of frame up. Any reporter could have gone to the Mezzaluna and photographed the curbside where the glasses were allegedly found that would have totally discredited the claim they were lying there for more than an hour. Any reporter could have questioned the Mezzaluna employees and determined who the parking valets were and whether they ever observed the glasses lying in the street right next to their valet stand were cars were arriving and leaving for the hour the glasses were allegedly there. But if you read the LA Times, you will find their stories on the case were nothing but propaganda for the cops and prosecutors....Oh, and BTW, the LA Times is one of those CIA cooperating papers that also covered up the CIA's drug operations that were going through LA from the far east, a story that was discovered by, I believe, a reporter for the San Diego paper who was subsequently murdered. Oh, and did Fuhrman have such control over the media that he could guarantee they would spin the story as it needed to be for him to get away with murder and framing a national celebrity? Is there a movie script with such a story line? I didn't think so. It would have been child’s play for the CIA, however, as they demonstrated with the campaign they waged to discredit those who were challenging the Warren Report conclusion of Oswald the lone nut theory (BTH, E. Howard Hunt was in charge of the spin machine that did it). They did it so well the press still refuses to consider the alternative. The same job was done in the Simpson case, and there is no organization other than the CIA that could have ensured that a blanket would be thrown on the evidence in the case that covered up the prosecution's lies and perpetuated that the prosecution's version as the truth in this case, with hardly a discouraging word allowed to intrude. Prien