[ Home | Contents | Search | Next | Previous | Up ]
Date: 04 Mar 2012
Time: 04:45:59 PM
Pardon me, I thought it might be helpful, it's something I STRONGLY believe is true and important. If it is true and important then why would you have a problem with that? Could you be upset because I used Jasper's term in a nutshell, I meant no disrespect, rather the opposite, as to put forward a crucial theory of evidence in a concise way; i.e. in a nutshell. What is the point of giving feedback or offering ideas that would support the main ideas of Iago from what I can tell. In no way as far as I'm aware, does any of what I wrote contradict what Jasper wrote. Perhaps it's excessive in length but I'm not a professional writer and maybe you should be grateful I am not a writer because I could very well write self publish and successfully market my own book on my own theories which aren't that much different than Jasper's but don't worry that probably won't happen. Sorry to have upset you, that definitely was not my intention I sincerely was only trying to relay something I strongly believed could be crucial in breaking the case for you and Jasper to ponder perhaps in a new way, it wasn't meant as a challenge or contention or to start trouble absolutely not. It's not the first time I've been blasted on this board or doubted but one of the best things was when I watched OJ Monster or Myth and much of what I had previously wrote that other posters found questionable or objectionable was confirmed by either OJ, Arnelle or his lawyers. Maybe I do write excessively I apologize for that, but they're complex issues. Sorry if what I wrote didn't help you because that is all I was trying to do.