Iago March - December Discussion

[ Home | Contents | Search ]


Re: Iago Exposed

From: LawyerGrl
Date: 04 Dec 2011
Time: 10:51:22 PM

Comments

Rovaan, Again, nothing sinister in what I am doing or have done, except now I am being a smartass as I believe you all deserve it after what your team has all but called me a liar. LMAO, this is really unbelievable that it seems you are so ready to "attack" someone for a simple question, seriously? As a newbie here, I cannot help but think you all have something to hide or defend so vigorously, except I am not sure what that could possible be, your extreme posts keep me so occupied in defending myself, I haven't had a chance to see what it is you all are talking about. Apparently, your organization needs to post warnings to anyone new.......should you ask a question, be prepared to be slandered, accused of sinister intentions, not posting in good faith, and be put on the chopping block for all to jump on your ass, and if you can't that, don't post. I will leave this site, but if you are truly wanting people to pay attention to what you have said, I would highly suggest that you all step back, take a deep breath. Not everyone who asks a simple question is out to hurt this site, or in cohoots with someone else.... I am still laughing at the advice you gave me... Allow me to quote you "Speaking of history, when you are new (?) to a site and don't know the history, it is generally best not to start posting in an attack manner and then be surprised when you receive harsh words". That should have been your first clue that I was new and didn't have a clue as to your history....I missed the prerequisite of length of time lurking, the laws of first posts, etc....I am being a smart ass here to get you to see how bizarre this really is. For a bunch of people who seem to have everything figured out, including me knowing Prein, or being one in the same, you missed that mark. I found the discussion board link searching for OJ Simpson, then clicked on several links. I couldn't remember where I read about Jasper, so I googled it when I was responding to Jaspers post, I opened another browser and simply didn't know where I read a little about him, but remembered some tidbit about him wanting people to really take this information seriously and was really trying to get there, and resorted to Google. As interesting as you might think it sounds to Google Jasper, refer to how he responded to me for my first post, who wouldn't google him? Everyone else here uses aliases, but him as far as I can tell. It is so far from what you think. You are not an expert on how people find your site, nor what I did to find this site, much less googling Jasper. I wanted to find out if this guy is legit or some lunitic. Which by the way, I am beginning to think the latter of all of you, based on your vicious "attack" on me. Jasper's posts accused me of changing copyrighted info, implying that I was sinister in my posts, and therefore not to be believed. My first post was simple, not in attack mode whatsoever "@bobsnhawaii What laws are you speaking of? I am curious?". I asked and claified by saying I was curious. Did not attack by definition http://www.thefreedictionary.com/attack if being curious about his post is against your policies, so be it, but did not expect to be insulted by bobsinhawaii "LawyerGrl: With a screen name like "LawyerGrl", you should be smart enough to know the answer to your question." I was shocked at his answer. I wanted to understand where he was coming from as what he stated was in my opinion off base and was wondering if I was missing something about posting here and his thought process on the legal system, and really not much more than that. Simply put, it was a simple question from a lawyer who was curious about someone's interpretation of the law. We don't make them, but we argue them, and Judges interpret them. This is the best laugh I have had for free in a long time. Thanks and Au revoir.


Last changed: 01/16/12