From: Prien
Date: 03 Aug 2011
Time: 08:44:21 PM
You got that right Mike. Park said he saw a figure near the front porch area on the driveway. Had OJ walked up the driveway from either the Bronco or from behind the garage, Park would have had a direct line of sight during the entire time he walked past the garage and into the front door. Park would have seen him enter the front door. Park never claimed to have seen anyone enterin the front door when he first saw the figure. Both the walkway blood drops and the glove behind the guest house were planted. OJ was never at either place that night. The driveway blood drops were supposed to be the breadcrumb trail that linked back to the Bronco blood drops and with the supposed shoe imprint, that linked it all back to Bundy. The bronco blood was all planted - every drop. The two most absurd blood drops in the Bronco were the drop in the door handle well that is a spot about two inches above the door handle. Since OJ was supposedly bleeding from the knuckle ofhis left middle finger, if he inserted that bleeding hand into the door well to open the door, he would have left a trailing blood smear just above the handle in a downward direction, and then another one when he removed it. He certainly would have left a smear trail from the point where the blood spot appears down to the door handle had he actually inserted his hand as high above the handle as the spot indicates. This blood spot is impossible as having been made by smeone opening the door as Marcia claimed. it was artifically created by using something like a q-tip to leave a blood spot on the rear wall of the door handle well. The other clearly fabricated blood evidence is the alleged shoe print. If you go to August's site where he has photos of the blood stains, you will see the imprint abutting a rounded corner of the floor mat. As best I can tell from photos depicting the driver's side with markers for all but two objects recovered from there, the corners on the frontward part of the mat are square. The corners are rounded only at the rear edge of the mat. That being so, the shoe print has to be on either the right or left rear edge. It cannot be the left rear edge because there is nothing there. It can, instead, only be the right rear edge. And that is where the cap was found. The cap covered up the alleged shoe imprint while they were recovering and documenting the recovery of the other blood evidence. The rug with the stain was marked Item #33. The photos have the marker 33 under the emergency brake pedal at the front. If you then go to Fung's testimony of April 4 and search for 33,you will find Goldberg engaging in an antirely fraudulent presentation of information about this evidnce during which Fung appears to describe Item 33 as being "the carpet itself" rather than the shoe imprint. That, of course, is a lie, since it wasn't the carpet that was evidence but the shoe imprint. It is by the fraud Goldberg perpetrated the prosecution covered up the actual location of the shoe imprint in the bronco because it is impossible for anyone to have made that imprint by stepping on the rug at that location and exerting the downward pressure needed to ceate it, and created instead a false impression of where it was found. Of course, since Fung never identified where the imprint was found, he never committed perjury by making it appear it was somewhere near the emergency brake pedal where the marker was. That's how lawyers lie while protecting their witnesses from perjury charges. These two blood items are clearly fabrications, which means all the others are as well. Prien