[ Home | Contents | Search | Post | Next | Previous | Up ]
From: Jasper
Date: 4/22/02
Time: 1:08:37 AM
Rovaan,
Everything you say here is logical and backed by the facts - except this: "You talk about people hearing the barking for 45 minutes. That is because it started around 10:15pm but the dog is not stationary. He was moving around and it would depend on the dog's location whether people would have heard the dog."
What? Was that a misprint? Is this a test? Are you tossing out the Heidstra timeline and substituting it with the Eva Stein/Pablo Fenjves timeline? if so, WHY?!!!
Where do you suppose Heidstra got the idea that he left his apartment at 10:15 (after checking his watch) and arrived at the point in his walk where heard the barking begin twenty minutes later? --Jasper