From: Jean
Date: 21 Oct 2008
Time: 09:48:05 AM
Yes she was. I do not know if she was an agent or not. Whether intentional or not, her story dominated the news. When a story dominates the news then many things can be going on that normally would be reported. It is kind of like when a news story dominates to that extent-beware-because few are paying attention to what else, in her case, is going on in Washington or the world behind the screen of a story that takes up most of the media time. Whether it was a planned distraction or not I do not know. I am more of a political junky than OJ junky,so I try to place the OJ trial into/along with what is going on in the rest of the world. It is sometimes very hard to ditenquish coincidence from some planned connecting factor. If two girls are killed in a mediam size town a month apart on say the 10th of the month-it is probably a coincidence but when a 3rd girl is killed the next month on the 10th, it is time to think it is not random and what connects the 3 girls. And who or what is behind the murders. If you connect what appears connected too soon because you have seen coincidencies as meaningful then you are chasing rainbows, if too late then you have missed oprotunities. But lets say Chandra Levi case it is suspecious that it was a smoke screen.