January Discussion

[ Home | Contents | Search ]

Re: O.J.'S BAIL HEARING

From: Jasper
Date: Saturday, January 26, 2008
Time: 10:12:34 PM

Comments

Theory Observer – Two circumstances combined to bring that group to that Palace Station Casino hotel room. 1). O.J. Simpson learned thought a letter written by Beardsley to Riccio, that many personal items that could only have been stolen were being put up for sale. 2) The LAPD (the jurisdiction in which the items were stolen) and the FBI (stolen goods transported across state lines) were notified of the attempt to sell O.J.’s property but refused to have anything to do with it. ……… I think I do see what you’re saying but from my starting point (the list of stolen goods that were supposed to be in the hotel room) I don’t see where luck had anything to do with it. ………..How do we know the guns were loaded? We don’t. We have only the word of one man that both guns were loaded – Michael McClinton, the man who owned both guns and displayed the one he carried. In an armed robbery case, it doesn’t matter whether the gun displayed is loaded or not. It doesn’t even have to be a real gun. Yet, McClinton volunteered information, which could not be independently verified, that BOTH guns were loaded and that He entered the room with his gun drawn and a round chambered. …………The police would have nothing linking the guns McClinton surrendered to them to the hotel incident without his voluntary statement that they were THE GUNS used (at O.J.’s behest, of course) in the “ROBBERY.” …………McClinton knew too much about firearms to give a loaded gun to a man who knew next to nothing about them and to load his own with a round in the chamber ready to fire. Without Alexander there would have been no McClinton. Without McClinton there would have been no guns. With the guns and McClinton’s knowledge of them I don’t think there was a chance in the world of one of the guns being fired accidentally but cause I just can’t see either of them being loaded. –Jasper

Last changed: 08/28/11