From: Prien@aol.com
Date: Sunday, January 20, 2008
Time: 04:59:41 PM
Anyone really interested in this should then check out the alt.fan_ojsimpson newsgroup where these issues were debated literally for years, and the NoJs were through demolished, and left with nothing nothing but personal invectives as arguments. There is, in fact nothing but unsubtantiated agitated air testimony and dog hearsay to suggest that the murders were committed as early as 10:30, and all the substantiation the prosecution and plaintiffs provided has been progressively revised to fit the prosecution time line. They lack even proof the dog ever had bloof on it. I've mentioned it before but not sure it made it to you board, but California Evidence Code section 412 prescribes that one basis for evaluating the credibility of evifdence is that "If weaker and less satisfactory evidence is offered when it was WITHIN THE POWER of the party to produce stronger and more satisfaftory evidence, the evidence offered should be viewed WITH DISTRUST." Since it was well within the power of the proseuction to produce stronger and more staisfactory evidence by presenting properly authenticated genuine phone companyrecords of calls than a bill of unknow source and origin, Section412 completely prescribes how this evidence was to be treatd by the jury and anyone else with a sound mind - as noithing but rat shit to be flushed down the toilet. And that's all there is to this story, and why Dr. Johnson keeps pointing out that genuine records havce never been provided, and that what was provided is nothing but nonsense. Prien Prien