From: Jasper
Date: Monday, December 31, 2007
Time: 03:17:15 PM
O.J. Nut— …I think Jean is concerned that she will put the life of someone other than herself in danger by posting her solution to the murders and the frame-up. Jean is an honest person and a dear friend. She works hard to find what she finds and put it together the way she does. She has posted much of why she has concluded what she has and shared with me other detailed aspects of her work in private correspondence. Therefore I know more of what she’s talking about than I can post. You will find much of Jean’s rationale for her conclusions in the work of Prien, Doc Johnson and his investigators. ……….. The bottom line is that Jean and I simply don’t agree on some photographic interpretations, the validity of some timeline documents, the credibility of some witnesses and the process of separating fact from supposition based on our personal experience. ……….. Lollie, Solitairea1 and I are in the same bind Jean feels that she is in with information we can’t post because of how we obtained it. However, we have confirmed that information through other sources and posted those sources along with our rationale for putting it together the way we did. We had to as a publically accessible check on the validity of our findings. …………Everyone has had the opportunity to contribute to the evolution of ideas that end up on High Points or Animations. You’ve seen how that works with changes to the original items that are made because someone spots something that is factually incorrect or subject to valid alternate interpretations. A recent example is the “Rockingham Hook-up” animation that you and Rovaan are primarily responsible for whipping into shape with your astute questions and observations. Jean has done this in other areas …………The importance of posting what we THINK is true and why so EVERYONE can see it, study it and critique it from different perspectives cannot be exaggerated. It doesn’t matter whether anyone gets anything right in any stage of investigation except the last stage. What matters is the consistent ability to see clearly what we’re dealing with and to discover, when possible, WHETHER IT IS RIGHT OR WRONG. Finding the wrong answers narrows the pool of possible right answers. If you find enough answers that can’t be right you can often find, by default, only one that can be right. ………… When you look at a series of questions leading to research, which leads to observations that lead to a definitive answer, you won’t find one person. You will find all of the people who contributed to it. The “solution-finder” is just the last person in line. ………… Popular perceptions of the O.J. case have created a blueprint for media personalities and law enforcement officials everywhere in North America to promote their own agendas at the expense of innocent people if they are so inclined. Too many of them ARE so inclined. For example, would Michael Skakel be in prison without that blueprint to follow? Would Greg Coleman, a key witness against Michael that Mark Fuhrman interviewed to write his second bestseller, have suffered an “accidental” drug death before that case went to trial? I doubt it. –Jasper