From: Mike
Date: Thursday, June 28, 2007
Time: 11:30:56 PM
Hi Jasper I suppose I am just very skeptical about the whole timeline issue. Too much is relied upon by people who did not see or hear anything , or by those who could not remember a thing at the time but at the trial had it almost to the second ! Heidstra is of course the foundation block as it were but are we really relying too much on his recollection ? People want to assume that everything about the case is somehow evidence. But the reality is that Heidstra may have heard something not related to the murders. I know it all seems to match up ! But after all this time I remain unconvinced.