From: Jasper
Date: Wednesday, June 27, 2007
Time: 03:57:59 PM
Mike, …It’s not odd if the murders happened around 10:35. The combined testimony of Pilnak, Heidstra, Schwab, Mandel, Aaronson and Harmon all say that it must have happened after 10:30. Stein’s time testimony is worthless because she was going in and out of sleep and didn’t look at a clock. Storfer’s testimony could mesh with Fenjves’ but that doesn’t mark the start of the killings. With Aaronson and Mandel hearing and seeing nothing remarkable between 10:27 and 10:32, there is no way the dog could have been barking CONTINUOUSLY the way Heidstra and Pilnak described what they heard starting around 10:35. That means the killing were either over or they hadn’t started yet. They couldn’t have started earlier because Nicole was on the phone talking to her mother. ………… Fenjves could have been right about the sound of the dog he heard between 10:15 and 10:20. He called it “a plaintive wail.” He said that it sounded like a “very unhappy animal.” An unhappy dog does not bark “hysterically.” A terrified dog does. A dog that makes the sound Fenjves said he heard before 10:25 could have been locked out of the gate. After following Dick Wagner’s study of how all of the timeline witnesses could have been right by simply factoring in the dog on the move, I believe that’s what did happen. The killer arrived early, let the dog out and locked him out. The dog howled to be let back in for a few minutes then walked around the block to try to get in the front way, then back again when he saw that gate was locked, too. –Jasper