[ Home | Contents | Search ] April Discussion March Discussion
From: Jasper
Date: Saturday, April 28, 2007
Time: 01:08:01 PM
Lollie, … Most of the material in the Picture Gallery is from movies that I could not include in the Smoking Gun books. Either I did not have access to the movies when I wrote the books or their significance wasn’t apparent until someone posted something here that led me to them. The primes underlying all three Smoking Gun books and the Fuhrman at the Movies chapter of Iago is that the man behind the framing of O.J. Simpson got most of his ideas from movies and TV shows. ……….. The topper is the photographic evidence. Here you see in the evidence itself the work of someone with an eye for artistic composition – if YOU have an eye for this type of thing. You see it in the particular items and the way they are arranged. The only other place you see composition like this is in the Murder in Brentwood Mothers poem photo with the placement of the doll, the flowers and the paper right down to the moist edges and curls relative to the gate and blood. The chalk marks in that photo are a dead give-away that it was staged. The composition of the crime scene photos, including the position of the bodied, show that they were staged by the same person who staged the Mothers poem photo. It could not have been anyone else. …………You know that the pictures in Political Bodies are staged because they were taken straight out of movies. All of these movies have a connection to Mark Fuhrman. That’s the whole point of comparing them to ALL of the evidence against O.J. associated with Fuhrman. They follow the same patterns with a little of this and a little of that taken from hundreds of movies and inserted with minor adjustments into all of Fuhrman’s words and deeds about the Bundy murders. He did it again with HIS movie version of Murder in Greenwich with Fuhrman casting Michael Skakel in the role of O.J. ………..There are many facets to the O.J. story as Fuhrman tells it and a combination of movie scenes with crossover actors, locations, props and themes to match all of them. This is the master pattern in Fuhrman’s entire body of “great detective” work. What you see in actual cases with Fuhrman you also see in movies. Whenever you hear him mischaracterize something in any case, emphasize something that seems to mean nothing, or insert something that doesn’t belong, you can find it in movies. Moreover, he “drops enough clues” to tell you where to look. That’s why I resorted to the movies when I could not find what should have been recorded about Tom Nolan and Phillips’ stories about him started sounding like a Fuhrman story. So far, it looks like it was a Fuhrman story with cinematic sources to fit the theme just as you see in Political Bodies. –Jasper