[ Home | Contents | Search | Next | Previous | Up ]
From: Jasper
Date: Monday, March 26, 2007
Time: 06:48:00 AM
Solitairea1, …I didn’t say that Fuhrman wasn’t a Mason. I believe he is. I just don’t believe there are any Mason links to him that tie into secret satanic rights and power at the highest levels of government and commerce passed through bloodlines down the ages. The old, entrenched Masons at Ford were a major pain in the butt with their racism, nepotism and power games. But, for the most part, they did their jobs well. They did not take the company down the tubes – the “new blood” did. ……… This entire Illuminati thing is about “old blood.” Another way of saying it is “old money,” meaning wealth AND position derived from deep ancestral roots. Old money does not expand proportionally with new social developments that produce great individual wealth. There are baseball players making so many millions PER YEAR that they could easily become billionaires in less than a decade if they lived on less and invested more wisely. You would be stunned by some of the people running billion-dollar corporations who really did get there by “building a better mousetrap.” ……….What I’m trying to say is that I don’t believe any group, no matter how wealthy, secretive and well-connected at any given time can sustain a dominating political and economic influence over the world for 30 or 40 generations. Old money always makes more money in war. Sometimes (but not always) they start wars to make money. But wars also produce entrepreneurs who become the new rich and new leaders who become the new top echelon of political leaders. This development cannot be predicted or orchestrated by old money. The old money has to fall in step with the new ways of doing things, get out of Dodge, or perish. ……….The Masons cannot pull everybody’s stings and Fuhrman could not have advance the way he did by pulling the strings of Masons at “more influential levels.” Murdering Ron Goldman and Nicole Simpson the way he did, getting the “face time” he was sure to get and writing a book about his involvement in the case is what put him in that position. I think that he had helpful friends who were Masons. But he also had helpful friends who were private investigators, city attorneys, lab technicians, ex-convict or would-be convict informants, parole officers, old military contacts and cops. Especially cops. And especially cops he represented as a delegate to the Police Protective League. ……..We know that Fuhrman knows a hell of a lot about Masons because he displayed so many of their “secret” symbols and magic numbers all over the place. What did he reveal about his role and the people he represented in the PPL? NOTHING. That’s the organization within an origination that he could exert great power through in building overlapping networks of intelligence gatherers and operatives. THAT group is REALLY secret. There isn’t a single name we can document that is tied to him while he was in his PPL leadership position or a single image we can conjure up with him in that role – unless he borrowed them from Freemasons to throw people like us off track. He had to anticipate that we would emerge but he could not anticipate who we would be or how much influence we would have. Fuhrman is devious. His Masonic clues are not. –Jasper