[ Home | Contents | Search | Next | Previous | Up ]
From: Jasper
Date: Thursday, March 22, 2007
Time: 06:19:35 AM
Mike, …Motives have nothing to do with Paddy’s Compliance With the Law Quotation. It’s about identifying groups of people with patterns of law-breaking that repeat often enough to make them predictable in others. That’s the Compliance-with-the-law part of it. The “quotation” part is about numbers – like scores on a multi-part test. ……..Say, for instance, you wanted to see what all enduring, professional poker players have in common. You get a long list of them identified by the porker tournaments they entered in the last ten years or so and their level of success. When you learn which questions to ask to get reliable “scores” in the highest range that clearly separate them from individuals in any other group, you have an objective way to measure who belongs to this group and who doesn't. You can tell without knowing any more about them than a number. ……….In any event, the “moment of madness” explanation for the Bundy murders already has a proven matrix (or “profile,” if you prefer). It was drawn from a large pool of people who murdered their mates or former mates this way. O.J. was tested against this matrix and he did not come close. You have to force-fit him into the killer’s skin by tossing out everything that doesn’t fit and adding allegations that don’t stand up to scrutiny. That’s what the prosecution did in the criminal trial and what the plaintiffs did in the civil trial. No profiler who has pronounced O.J.’s guilt based on “his” profile has ever tested him. ALL of them have leaned heavily on false statements of media pundits and testimony of proven liars. ……..How, for instance, can you square the testimony of Denise Brown and others at Sydney’s recital who said O.J. was in a dark and ugly mood with the video of a passing stranger that showed him laughing and hugging his in-laws? Where is the EVIDENCE of O.J. the stalker and O.J. the spouse-abuser that doesn’t depend on the testimony of people with a vested interest in painting him that way? Where is the essential escalation of “O.J.’s” violence toward Nicole before the night she and Ron were murdered? And where, as Paddy asked, is O.J.’s propensity for breaking the law, which he must have had if he dressed up like a stereotypical murder mystery, action move, erotic thriller killer of the 1980s and 90s to slash Nicole’s tires? The tires were in the back of the condo with the coins and the plastic heart. The killings were in the front with the heart drawn in blood on a crisp heel print. ……….Opening the blade of either the German Stiletto or the Swiss Army knife was impossible with gloves on. The killer would have had to put the gloves on AFTER he opened the blade, which means he was prepared to use it when and where he did use it. That is not a description of someone who lost control for a split second to perform a grisly irrational act. And that is not to mention the time required in advance to assemble that incriminating costume and to dispose of the accessories he didn’t leave behind in one neat, little cluster inches away from artificial shapes in blood. –Jasper