[ Home | Contents | Search | Next | Previous | Up ]
![]()
From: Jasper
Date: Sunday, February 25, 2007
Time: 10:12:05 PM
Jean, …Outstanding post! ………Some newcomers to Iago might not get what we are doing by posting the things that make us think and feel the way we do and proposing so many theories to explain what we think we know at a given time. Your post should make it easier. …….. Stillatlarge began these Anna Nicole Smith discussions with something about it being “off topic.” I didn’t know where Stillatlarge got that idea given the key role that her stand-in for The Naked Gun 33 1/3 played in the shaping of O.J.’s public image as a spouse abuser and a killer. http://www.smartfellowspress.com/smokinggun/Smoke_3/smoke_3_chap_25.htm (search “saintly” and keep reading until you get to “Flatliners.” Fuhrman, “suppository” comment, by the way, is directly related to Stella Steven – a former Playboy playmate – in The Poseidon Adventure with Leslie Nielsen). I thought that the Fuhrman links to the Bundy murders and the movies would dry up quickly. Instead they are multiplying with the things he says about THIS case and the things associated with him in Anna Nicole’s memorial on the medical examiner’s lawn. ………….Stillatlarge does not know the full story of why Fuhrman’s “rattlesnake” comment jumped out at me the way it did. The fact is, I saw The Mighty Quinn connection to his rattlesnake-in-a suit comment THE DAY BEFORE he made it and told someone in this group about it in a phone conversation that night. It wasn’t a rattlesnake but it was a poisonous snake. I posted that it came out of a suitcase full of $10,000 bill (McKinley) and bit a helicopter pilot. I was mistaken. The money came out of the suitcase and went into a bag. The snake was in the bag. The snake crawled up the leg of the pilot’s flight SUIT and bit him. …………None of this could mean a thing if Anna Nicole died of something other than a foreign agent that acted like a poison in her body. It won’t touch the theory that Fuhrman knew so much about her case because he was already working on a book about Daniel’s death but it would obviously make the connection to Anna Nicole more remote. We’ll just have to wait and see how all of that either fits together or doesn’t. ………..Regardless of we can include and exclude from consideration when we know the results of the toxicology report on Anna Nicole and who the baby’s father is, this discussion will be important down the road. We’ll see not only what connects up and what doesn’t but why each of changed our thinking AND or FEELINGS at various points and who what was responsible for initial impressions and the changes. None of the assumption we made in proposing possible solutions to this mystery will be wasted. Most importantly, I think, is what you said about it being a mystery. As long as anything is a mystery to us, it gives us something to think about. As long as we are thinking we have a good chance of finding the real answers even if they seem to be illogical. ……….Thanks Jean. –Jasper
![]()