From: Jasper
Date: Sunday, June 04, 2006
Time: 03:03:48 PM
Lollie, …Stuff like this is just plain creepy to me. Sometimes I get the feeling, from these Fuhrman quotes that he is toying with us. He’s even using the same words we used, talking about a “military ambush” and confirming that some things that seemed impossible or at least improbable to people without his special knowledge were “easy.” ………. It’s a statistical certainty that an overwhelming majority of people will reject out of hand ANYTHING that is obviously improbable. That’s the core of the widespread and deeply rooted beliefs that one man could not have fired three well-aimed rounds in six seconds from the sixth floor of the Texas School Book Depository in Dallas and that John F. Kennedy was shot in the head from the front. The improbability that anyone other than O.J. Simpson could have murdered Ron and Nicole based on the “obvious” evidence is also the core of the widespread and deeply rooted belief that he did murder them. ………. I confess that I could have been biased in my reading of Fuhrman’s A Simple Act of Murder at the onset in his favor because his four-dimensional analytical approach to the assassination itself was identical to my approach to the Bundy murders. The only place he fell down was in ruling out a conspiracy of planning and execution altogether and naming Lee Harvey Oswald as the only possible killer. ……….. Ironically, the best place to see how Oswald could have been setup to take the fall is in a movie called The Package with Gene Hackman and Tommy Lee Jones. The movie replaces a marine as the patsy with a soldier. It changes the setting of the assassination to Chicago (not much of a stretch given evidence of Mafia plans to assassinate Kennedy in Tampa, Chicago and Dallas with a patsy in place in all three cities). The movie updates the assassination plan to 1989 and uses fictional characters to move the plot along. Nevertheless, if you know the story of how Oswald really could have been framed for killing JFK, you’ll see it in this movie. ………..You can get any scenario to work with a careful selection of evidence and testimony in two-dimensions (what you see in a photo or on a screen). But when you add the dimension of depth from many angles, your view of the possible changes. Some scenarios become impossible. Some become unlikely and some elements in any possible scenario, no matter how unlikely (like O.J.’s cut finger story), become certain. Animating these scenarios gives you the fourth dimension, time. With enough raw data to work with you can now apply geometry, trigonometry, calculus and special knowledge of the variables involved to rule out the impossible in all four dimensions and find the solution. ………. Don’t let the higher math throw you. If you’ve ever caught a ball in flight or shot one through a hoop you have done many of the calculations in your head that a rocket scientist does on a chalkboard. This is how Fuhrman, with some special knowledge from his personal history to plug in the right names and numbers, was able to do what he did in A Simple Act of Murder: November 22, 1963. He found where improbable answers in the JFK assassination were the right ones. The eerie thing is that so many people still can’t see how he applied this knowledge on June 12, 1994. –Jasper