From: Jade
Date: February 11, 2006
Time: 01:07 AM
That Link didnt come out good, so I copied it........................................ ........................................... <http://groups.google.com/groups/img/watched_n.gif> A JFK Book By Mark Fuhrman Coming April 2006 -- "A Simple Act Of Murder" « Start of topic « Older Messages 1 - 9 of 9 Newer » End of topic » Fixed font - Proportional font <http://groups.google.com/groups/img/dot_clear.gif> From: David VP - view profile Date: Sun, Feb 5 2006 4:04 pm Email: "David VP" <davevonp...@aol.com> Groups: alt.conspiracy.jfk Not yet rated Rating: show options Reply | Reply to Author | Forward | Print | Individual Message | Show original | Report Abuse | Find messages by this author I had no idea that Mr. Fuhrman was writing a book about the JFK case. Did anyone see this book -- "A SIMPLE ACT OF MURDER: NOVEMBER 22, 1963" -- on the horizon at all? Looks very interesting. I located this info link re. Mark Fuhrman's upcoming 288-page JFK book (scroll to Page 52 of this Adobe document)........ http://www.harpercollins.com/ForeignRightsGuide.pdf Here's what the blurb says about "A Simple Act Of Murder: November 22, 1963": "Mark Fuhrman, America's most famous detective, turns his sights on the biggest crime of the 20th century: the assassination of John F. Kennedy. More than forty years later, the case remains unsolved. "A Simple Act Of Murder" is the investigation that this case should have had from the beginning. Fuhrman cuts through the myths and misinformation to focus on the hard evidence. "He examines the ballistics and medical records, scrutinizes photographs from the crime scene and the famous Zapruder Film, and weighs the testimony of hundreds of witnesses. "Filled with vivid photos and informative diagrams and original drawings by Fuhrman himself -- this book is the visual record of the JFK assassination. Fuhrman discovers a major clue that has been ignored for forty years, and will change the debate over the assassination. He overturns accepted notions about the way the murder occurred. Fuhrman has no agenda. He is neither a defender of the official story, nor a conspiracy theorist. He just wants to uncover the truth." Reply <http://groups.google.com/groups/img/dot_clear.gif> From: Sam - view profile Date: Sun, Feb 5 2006 6:58 pm Email: "Sam" <jfki...@sammcclung.com> Groups: alt.conspiracy.jfk Not yet rated Rating: show options Reply | Reply to Author | Forward | Print | Individual Message | Show original | Report Abuse | Find messages by this author isn't furman a known evidence alterer? Reply <http://groups.google.com/groups/img/dot_clear.gif> From: David VP - view profile Date: Sun, Feb 5 2006 8:15 pm Email: "David VP" <davevonp...@aol.com> Groups: alt.conspiracy.jfk Not yet rated Rating: show options Reply | Reply to Author | Forward | Print | Individual Message | Show original | Report Abuse | Find messages by this author No..... Fuhrman is not a "known evidence alterer". Fuhrman was a good detective who did his job properly in the Simpson case and was treated like a criminal for no good reason at all. Fuhrman, as proven by 14 different LAPD officers, couldn't have "planted" that bloody glove in 1994 even if he had wanted to plant it....because there was no second glove at the crime scene to pick up and plant elsewhere. Never happened. And I think Fuhrman might provide a kind of unique perspective re. the wholly-improbable and impossible-to-pull-off series of so-called "Planted Evidence" issues in the JFK case, via his own experience as a police officer who was accused unjustly of "planting" evidence in the O.J. case. The very idea of so much mass "planting" of LHO-incriminating evidence being performed so perfectly is just flat-out ridiculous. Never happened. And I hope this is brought up with force in both Mr. Fuhrman's new volume (and followed by Mr. Bugliosi's tome in 2007). The CT "It Was All Faked" Brigade has worn out its welcome. Reply <http://groups.google.com/groups/img/dot_clear.gif> From: aeffects - view profile Date: Sun, Feb 5 2006 8:39 pm Email: "aeffects" <aeffe...@hotmail.com> Groups: alt.conspiracy.jfk Not yet rated Rating: show options Reply | Reply to Author | Forward | Print | Individual Message | Show original | Report Abuse | Find messages by this author David VP wrote: > No..... Fuhrman is not a "known evidence alterer". Fuhrman was a good > detective who did his job properly in the Simpson case and was treated > like a criminal for no good reason at all. > Fuhrman, as proven by 14 different LAPD officers, couldn't have > "planted" that bloody glove in 1994 even if he had wanted to plant > it....because there was no second glove at the crime scene to pick up > and plant elsewhere. Never happened. we won't make Furhman THE topic of the JFK debate will we now VonPeanut? > And I think Fuhrman might provide a kind of unique perspective re. the > wholly-improbable and impossible-to-pull-off series of so-called > "Planted Evidence" issues in the JFK case, via his own experience as a > police officer who was accused unjustly of "planting" evidence in the > O.J. case. LOL -- unique is right -- so unique it smells like a daBUG - Spence rerun... Dick Tracy and Tess could head up a new commission re this case, the rest of the world will STILL be suspicious... - Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - > The very idea of so much mass "planting" of LHO-incriminating evidence > being performed so perfectly is just flat-out ridiculous. Never > happened. And I hope this is brought up with force in both Mr. > Fuhrman's new volume (and followed by Mr. Bugliosi's tome in 2007). > The CT "It Was All Faked" Brigade has worn out its welcome. Reply <http://groups.google.com/groups/img/dot_clear.gif> From: David VP - view profile Date: Sun, Feb 5 2006 8:54 pm Email: "David VP" <davevonp...@aol.com> Groups: alt.conspiracy.jfk Not yet rated Rating: show options Reply | Reply to Author | Forward | Print | Individual Message | Show original | Report Abuse | Find messages by this author >> "We won't make Furhman THE topic of the JFK debate will we now VonPeanut?" No, a(hole)effects .... I was merely answering the earlier question about the silly claim about Fuhrman being an "evidence alterer" himself. Do ya mind? Reply <http://groups.google.com/groups/img/dot_clear.gif> From: aeffects - view profile Date: Mon, Feb 6 2006 1:35 am Email: "aeffects" <aeffe...@hotmail.com> Groups: alt.conspiracy.jfk Not yet rated Rating: show options Reply | Reply to Author | Forward | Print | Individual Message | Show original | Report Abuse | Find messages by this author anyone wih credibility can post here, even you, if you work at it... look forward to something, anything of value from you -- but, alas -- what we goet is defending the undefendable, again..... roflmfao! Reply <http://groups.google.com/groups/img/dot_clear.gif> From: Bud - view profile Date: Sun, Feb 5 2006 9:29 pm Email: "Bud" <sirsl...@fast.net> Groups: alt.conspiracy.jfk Not yet rated Rating: show options Reply | Reply to Author | Forward | Print | Individual Message | Show original | Report Abuse | Find messages by this author - Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - aeffects wrote: > David VP wrote: > > No..... Fuhrman is not a "known evidence alterer". Fuhrman was a good > > detective who did his job properly in the Simpson case and was treated > > like a criminal for no good reason at all. > > Fuhrman, as proven by 14 different LAPD officers, couldn't have > > "planted" that bloody glove in 1994 even if he had wanted to plant > > it....because there was no second glove at the crime scene to pick up > > and plant elsewhere. Never happened. > we won't make Furhman THE topic of the JFK debate will we now > VonPeanut? > > And I think Fuhrman might provide a kind of unique perspective re. the > > wholly-improbable and impossible-to-pull-off series of so-called > > "Planted Evidence" issues in the JFK case, via his own experience as a > > police officer who was accused unjustly of "planting" evidence in the > > O.J. case. > LOL -- unique is right -- so unique it smells like a daBUG - Spence > rerun... Dick Tracy and Tess could head up a new commission re this > case, the rest of the world will STILL be suspicious... Your few remaining brain cells might have fired on an actual idea there Healy. If the world has decided they want to be suspicious of this event, perhaps they should be left alone with the opinion they are comfortable with. No use troubling them with the facts. - Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - > > The very idea of so much mass "planting" of LHO-incriminating evidence > > being performed so perfectly is just flat-out ridiculous. Never > > happened. And I hope this is brought up with force in both Mr. > > Fuhrman's new volume (and followed by Mr. Bugliosi's tome in 2007). > > The CT "It Was All Faked" Brigade has worn out its welcome. Reply <http://groups.google.com/groups/img/dot_clear.gif> From: Sam - view profile Date: Sun, Feb 5 2006 9:02 pm Email: "Sam" <jfki...@sammcclung.com> Groups: alt.conspiracy.jfk Not yet rated Rating: show options Reply | Reply to Author | Forward | Print | Individual Message | Show original | Report Abuse | Find messages by this author http://www.courttv.com/trials/ojsimpson/weekly/33.html this page seems to paint a different picture of fuhrman fuhrman appears to be just another propagandist cashing in on the notoriety of his name while delivering nothing "David VP" <davevonp...@aol.com> wrote in message news:1139188546.274653.213550@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com... - Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - > No..... Fuhrman is not a "known evidence alterer". Fuhrman was a good > detective who did his job properly in the Simpson case and was treated > like a criminal for no good reason at all. > Fuhrman, as proven by 14 different LAPD officers, couldn't have > "planted" that bloody glove in 1994 even if he had wanted to plant > it....because there was no second glove at the crime scene to pick up > and plant elsewhere. Never happened. > And I think Fuhrman might provide a kind of unique perspective re. the > wholly-improbable and impossible-to-pull-off series of so-called > "Planted Evidence" issues in the JFK case, via his own experience as a > police officer who was accused unjustly of "planting" evidence in the > O.J. case. > The very idea of so much mass "planting" of LHO-incriminating evidence > being performed so perfectly is just flat-out ridiculous. Never > happened. And I hope this is brought up with force in both Mr. > Fuhrman's new volume (and followed by Mr. Bugliosi's tome in 2007). > The CT "It Was All Faked" Brigade has worn out its welcome. Reply <http://groups.google.com/groups/img/watched_n.gif> A JFK Book By Mark Fuhrman Coming April 2006 -- "A Simple Act O... <http://groups.google.com/groups/img/dot_clear.gif> From: lazuli...@webtv.net - view profile Date: Mon, Feb 6 2006 3:51 pm Email: lazuli...@webtv.net Groups: alt.conspiracy.jfk Not yet rated Rating: show options Reply | Reply to Author | Forward | Print | Individual Message | Show original | Report Abuse | Find messages by this author That blurb sounds like vintage Henry Lee-either murduh or not murduh, either conspiracee or not conspiracee Laree. Reply « Start of topic « Older Messages 1 - 9 of 9 Newer » End of topic » « Newer topic - REPLY HARTMAN's Touch History; a Grass Raised Bullet Track & Curb Nick - Older topic » ©2006 Google
