From: Jasper
Date: October 20, 2005
Time: 04:44 PM
Pease give us a name – any name – in the From box so we can distinguish you from others who do not supply a name or forget to do so. It will also help us make sense of this thread if it gets long and posters insert there messages at different points. A relevant title would also be nice. ……….Some of the information you supplied is new to me and I’d like to explore it with you. Some of it was revealed during or shortly after the O.J. criminal trial and civil trial in various books (notably A Problem of Evidence and Killing Time) and articles on the Internet. We got some of it from the trial transcripts. Assembling it in a rational configuration with functional relationships to other information has always been the difficulty. ……….I have numerous reasons for believing that the drug connections and organized crime connections you identified have more to do with the environment that permitted the murders to take place and the cover-up that followed than with the motives of the killer. My first question to advocates of a drug hit is this: Why does so much evidence and early interpretation of evidence point to O.J. Simpson: Size-12 shoeprints consistent with the type of shoes O.J. was known to wear, spouse abuse witnesses, Fuhrman’s Bundy notes, bloody gloves with naturally shed Negroid limb hair, “bloody socks,” etc. ……….Remember, this is only my first question about the evidence pointing to a drug hit. Can you start there? I did. –Jasper