From: Solitairea1 to Jasper
Date: October 17, 2005
Time: 04:13 PM
Jasper, thanks for explaining more how Dominick Dunne could imply that Roselli could have murderd or had Vicky Morgan murdered. You're so right about the way Dunne, Fuhrman,Faye, Shipp and Denise shift time. I have "Inconvenient Woman" but it's been awhile since i've read it. Was Dunne implying that Roselli had Vicky Morgan murdered to protect the identity of who really did murder her, if he does indeed know who? .....About Denise's personal injury case, you're probably right on that one. I don't have any experience dealing with that, so could just be the way it's worded. But it was worded in such a way as to cloud the issue. .. ..And then Denise, after being asked a question or two about the injuries she sustained in the 1989 incident answeres a lower back injury. Then Denise is asked if she was aware of the penalties for perjury. And before that, the warnings regarding perjury, there's a discussion held off the record. ...What do you think the reasons are for the intentional clouding and confusing of this 1989 personal injury case? If the case commenced in 1989, does that mean that that's only when the "accident" occured, or does it also mean that that's also when the court case began? ...I wonder what the dates were that Denise pled guilty for her two DUI charges, and if she was sentenced at the time she pled guilty to each? ....Why was Denise warned about perjury after being questioned about her personal injury case? .................. Solitairea1