From: Jasper
Date: 12/1/2004
Time: 4:58:01 PM
Ludwig, ………..Bill Wasz told Bert Luper and Joe Bosco his Kardashian story long before anyone knew Kardashian was ill. I believe that Joe wrote is article in 1998 and I know he spent a long time “checking it out” before he wrote it. I don’t think Wasz’s motives have anything to do with keeping anybody out of prison. I think they have to do with Wasz staying alive in prison and when he got out. Hooking up with Joe Bosco gave him the visibility he needed to stay alive in prison and his Kardashian story gave Fuhrman a good reason not to kill him when he got out. ………..The only reason I think he says O.J. didn’t do it is because Joe Bosco is certain he didn’t do it personally the way “Marcia and company” argued he did. If you read between the lines of Joe’s A Problem of Evidence, as I’m sure Wasz did, you can see doubts that O.J. had anything to do with it. ………..Indeed, many people came away from his book thinking that he believed O.J. was innocent. That’s not what he wrote. He wrote that the prosecutors didn’t do their job in presenting the evidence necessary to convict him and consciously presented evidence and witness (particularly Mark Fuhrman) they knew were tainted. He left room for a scenario in which O.J. could have had some part in the murders and Fuhrman could have played a subordinate role. That’s the story Wasz gave him – without Fuhrman. ………..As you noted last month, if you buy Wasz’s story, O.J does not have an alibi and Fuhrman doesn’t need one because all of the evidence against him disappears. Do you think that’s a coincidence? I don’t. –Jasper