From:
Date: 6/10/02
Time: 4:49:35 PM
Jolan wrote:
"Charlie, Rovaan et al:-
"Fuhrman's alibi? Didn't have one. This is one issue which neither Junot nor Dick Wagner address in their respective theories and hence represent the major weakness in the theories."
Jolana"
While I have read much about Fuhrman's alibi, I have always ignored it for the simple reason that I see no reason for him to need one.
I explain on my webpage (now being reconstructed) that M.L. Rantala's book effectively destroys Fuhrman-did-it theories. I also add a reaon of my own -- that Fuhrman would not plant evidence as badly as it was planted in this case.
Also, I wasnt to add that I have yet to hear of any credible motive attributed to Fuhrman. There is NO evidence; no not the smallest scintilla; that Fuhrman ever met OJ or Nicole except for the minute-or-less baseball bat incident in 1986. If Nicole had been having a relationship with Fuhrman, she sure never mentioned it to her closest friends. Statements attributed to Fuhrman about Nicole are from extremely dubious sources.
Lastly, Fuhrman (like Lange and Vannatter) was a 'short-timer' on the verge of retirement and pension. He had already moved about half his personal life to Sand Point, Idaho. While the assertion that he was looking for a 'big case' to make his reputation would make sense if he was at the start of his career, it makes no sense at the end.
Wagner can speak for himself.
Junot