[ Home | Contents | Search ]
Time: 1:36:09 AM
I am sorry, but I do not see anything significant here. If I were murdered tomorrow, you could trace may family-tree to teachers and philosophers on my father's side to real-life gangsters and thugs on my mother's side...I'm neither. It's like saying my death was related to some old gangster vendetta or my great-grandfather flunked Al Capone in the third grade… Instead of attributing it to some coked-up fool who wanted to test out his new gun.
Short's murder has never been solved, but let us look at her life, as we know it:
1: She was a beautiful but wanna-be actress who never got a real break.
2:A known "flirt" and "party animal".
3:She had an (intimate) social deformality; under-developed genitals.
4:The manner in which she was mutilated suggest the murder (or murders) wanted to get to "the truth” i.e.-was she a transsexual, some guy in a dress, or some other form of freak”. In other words, the murder knew Short, but was sexually rejected and did not know why. Her physical abnormality (which made any type of sex impossible) was only known by her family and the coroner. The body was drained of most of its blood, which means a lot undisturbed time was spent with the body.
This is why I fail to see what her family linage had to do with anything.