From: Kari
Date: 6/11/01
Time: 9:06:52 PM
Remote Name: 64.165.86.10
Sorry for the error. Actually it was a run on sentence as you had stated in AFOJS that there is not blood trail at Bundy, and then made the mistake of adding the second thought, no reason to climb the wall. There was no reason to rush over to Rochingham when the kids were taken care of as they had been taken to the police station and there was no real reason. The amount of blood was also only a presumptive. They should have still been at Bundy taking care of the investigation. Because there was no real blood trail at Bundy there was no legal reason at that point in time to rush to Rockingham. Just like lined up dominoes, push one the entire premise is knocked down. Because there was no real blood trail nor need to rush over to personally inform O.J. Simpson, as if that is even possibly true, that his ex wife had been murdered. It was a lot more important to begin the investigation of the murder of two people. With no blood trail, no reason to go to Rockingham, that tiny amount of what was maybe blood since only presumptive testing had been done and the blood was not sufficient to warrant invading a man's privacy. The entire ruling relied on the blood trial at Bundy to rush to Rockingham unless they have some justification to believe that O.J. Simpson was in danger or injured which they had no reason to believe this. They had two bodies and the delay by running to Bundy was just absurd. It goes against the basic priniciples and procedures of police work. Yes I have taken a class and unless they changed the rules I doubt that running to a Celebrities house to tell him bad news and tell him to collect his kids just doesn't seem as relevent as taking care of the deceased and the crime scene. Call the coronor as begin an investigation like interviewing the neighbors about sound. The delay was pointless and bad police work. I am not alone in believing this as the New York forensic experts have been highly critical of the rush to go to Rockingham as well as many other actions not taken in a timely manner. Had it been your house they jumped the wall and entered unlawfully while two people, one related to you, lies dead in their own blood as the evidence becomes contaminated I believe you might see my point. Again I regret running what you said and my thought together. I believe in giving credit where credit is do and the point you keep making about there being no blood trail at Bundy is a good one. I was not doing anything but attempting to tell the truth and ran two thoughts together. I am sure I am not the only one who has done that. :)