From: Jean
Date: 5/22/01
Time: 7:23:15 PM
This is AC 2nd day of deposition. This part is right at the end of the day and explaines a lot. Like Judy being so upset after the recital. Look at the words closely, she was not talking about God as them, and who did they give what.
AC brought the kids to the Browns on June 13. And he is talking to Judy. And she said"WHY". "WHY WE GAVE" "WHY DIDN"T THEY TAKE ME?" and something to the effect that she would trade places.
Now to cofuse the issue, she askes AC if he thinks that OJ did it. It almost sounds like Judy and Nicole did something to more than one person and one of those persons was OJ. Could she have meant that she gave back the money or the information. Now whoever this was is powerful enought to put then all in fear of their lives if they did not say that OJ alone did it. They must not have been afraid of OJ, when they were blaming him, but afraid to tell what and who else they suspected. But why were they not afraid to have the kids there? Not only Sidney and Justin but the other two grandchildren.
Now there is more about AC asserting the privilage and it was not privilidge with his lawyer it was 5th amemdment of self incrimination. They shortened it to privilage so he did not have to keep saying the whole thing.
Now this is on June 14 and the question was "How long he had been at Kardasians that day?' Now this was an assertion of priviladge. But other things he answered about this day.
Now AC had driven to the Brown's, June 14, driven back to the Kardasians, and then went to help pack up Bundy. He was asked if he drove anyone else back from the Browns and he again asserted the priviladge. Was this the day he picked up the kids to take to OJ? Could this have been OJ? Or was this someone who they made a deal with, so that no one else would get hurt and Oj would be blamed.Was OJ being blamed and punished cause Nicole and Judy or Judy and Lou had done something to the group of who ever.
AC also said that when he got to Bundy, Lou was mad cause the authorites had left the door open. When asked which door he said I guess the front door.
Now what was odd, it is Kelly that is asking these questions that follow. "Did you ever see any blood drops in the foya or drive way? Did you ever see any cards?" AC said no but weeks later he saw a smear of red paint in the area. He said that Furman pointed to something in the Foyer and said he wanted these checked. AC could not see what he was pointing to. It was during the time that the cops kicked them out to search. AC had just opened the frount door and unlocked it so the police could go in and out and he saw nothing. Now why was Kelly asking this esculprery evidence. Did the Browns want to know if the blood was planted or not.
Another place AC was asked if he spoke to OJ on the 13th and he asserted the 5th.
I hope that the next parts of his deposition sheds some light on this.