From: Jasper
Date: 1/8/01
Time: 3:34:12 PM
Jean,
Speaking of phone calls... are your listening John? The killer planted at least one false timeline that ran smack into proof that it was a false timeline. Remember the 10:03 time on Nicole's watch (fits a scenario in which Nicole's watch was one minute slow and O.J. killed her immediately after failing to reach Paula)? Along with that, there were the two calls made by a woman (or women -- John says it was Kato pretending to be a woman) suggesting that Ron and Nicole had been kiilled several minutes earlier. Fuhrman spoke of a witness who saw a light -colored SUV in the alley where he said he matched the stick on O.J.'s parkway to an old picket fence. He didn't give a time but said that it was within the 9:40 to 10:50 time that O.J. could have committed the murders. He was arguing the importance of keeping the timeline flexable. The 10:17 to 10:28 phone call that Juditha made to Nicole rules out a timeline earlier than 10:28.
Keeping the timeline flexable allows the killer to shift the time the DA's could argue the killings occurred if one false timeline was closed. As long as the defense didn't bring up the 10:17 to 10:28 phone record, the frame-up on the early timeline would work. If they did bring it up, the DA's could argue another timeline. In any case, the killer had to know that O.J. saw no one, no one saw him and no one talked to him for ten or fifteen consecutive minutes between 10:00 and 10:50. Otherwise the whole operation would depend entirely on good luck. Nicole's movement's and phone calls would also have to be monitored. My best guess is somone blew his or her assignment with Nicole's last phone conversation with her mother and the killer didn't know about it until much later. However, with a flexible timeline he could work around it. O.J.'s defenders have been is best ally in this. They, too, insist on keeping in the timeline flexible. The more I learn about murder cases in general the clearer it becomes that this does not happhen by chance. It is a pattern that repeats itself in every case. No one wants to be pinned down to a time that could get them into trouble and everyone picks a timeline that seems to help them the most. Neither side wants to know the truth.
In any event, to carry out the killings in a way that implicated O.J. with shoes and gloves that had to have been purchased two or three years earlier without leaving too much to chance, Nicole and O.J. had to have been watched. To plant the false blood trail from the glove (three drops increasing in size indicating a rising hand) and along Nicole's walkway to the alley without trusting too much to luck, the killer had to know that O.J. was bleading. To know which glove to leave at Bundy without trusting too much to chance, the killer had to know that O.J. was bleeding from his left hand. To make a more believable frame BOTH gloves would have been planted on Rockingham -- unless chance ruled that option out. --Jasper