From: Jean
Date: 1/5/01
Time: 9:41:10 AM
Now Junot thinks that Kato was the murderer. I don't, but I think he may be on to something. Now lets just suppose that Kato was part of the plot, and all the phone business was just to give him an alibi. He was on OJ's back most of the day. He is another one that I think is a lot smarter than he appears. He had the opportunity to get OJ's blood ahead of time and to plant it at Rockingham. Now he lied at the trial by omission. Neither he nor Parks said that OJ went to the Bronco just before they left. Only OJ says that. Now there was 40 drops at Rockingham. Yet OJ did not see the cut when he looked. Kato knew he had nicks that they could "say" that he must have cut himself that night. It makes little since that OJ bled profusely (40 drops) and it suddenly stopped.
I cut my finger once on the about 1/2 inch from the end on the palm side surface. I bled like that as I nicked an tiney artery. Had to have stiches as even the nurse that I was working with could not stop it after an hour of trying. I was thinking more alone the 8 drops instead of 40. That is a lot of blood. Now the only reason that OJ thought he was bleeding is he saw blood on his hand. Now if you are concentrating on finding the cut, you would feel something.
OJ says that he and Kato went into the house. OJ stepped into the bathroom and got a glass of water. It was when he put the glass down that he saw the blood. He then walked into the kitchen and wiped off the blood and saw the time and hurried off. Kato playing the klutz could easily have smeared blood on OJ. More for Parks to see than OJ. Or for OJ to make a print in blood someplace. what ever. Now putting Kato in the plot, but not the killer, makes all the conincindences that day make sense. Open for critique.