Iago Discussion in Progress (continued)

[ Home | Contents ]

Re: Who's onn first?...

Pragma: no-cache
From: Jasper
Date: 14 Jul 2000
Time: 13:26:27

Comments

Jean,

For a murder frame-up plan to work it had to be flexible enough to take advantage of ANY situation where Ron and Nicole were alone and O.J. was by himself for ten or fifteen without an alibi.

As you have seen from all of the discussion boards on this case including these, a false timeline is the easiest thing in the world to create when you convince people that a given suspect is guilty. Nine people out of ten will bend the time to fit the evidence of guilt that convinced them no matter what stories they have to create or evidence they have to downplay or ignore to do it. They will assume that the tenth person is doing the same thing.

Time bending and the assumption that "everyone does it" are psycho-sociological constants as reliable as Functional Fixedness and the Primacy Effect. If the killer understood these principles (as policed detectives do) all he had to do to pull off the killing and the frame-up was to tune into the frequency of O.J.'s cell phone and watch is estate. In 1994 any phone that didn't use a cord was like a mini radio station broadcasting its own signal to anyone with a police scanner and know how to find the "the station." O.J. and Nicole both used wireless phones almost exclusively.

Keep in mind, Nicole's maid was also off that night, as a planed sexual tryst would require (one witness out of the way) and the plan could have worked just as well as better with GiGi at Rockingham. Consider what happened to Michelle's testimony in the '89 New Year's Day incident. The evidence would have been a little different to take her presence into account but it wouldn't have stopped the killing. --Jasper

 

Last changed: October 12, 2008