Pragma: no-cache
From: charlie
Date: 13 Jun 2000
Time: 09:21:19
Guilt or innocence aside or what it would or would not do with the real killer getting away, somebody is going to have to explain this to me.
Legally---why is it not allowed that the defendant in case that in under appeal NOT allowed the phone records that were used against him in two trials. Yet the prosecutors have them (in the Personal possession of Hodegman) and the plaintiffs allegedly have them.
With California's very strong discovery rules and laws, how can this be?
charlie