[ Home | Contents | Search | Post | Next | Previous | Up ]
From: Jasper
Date: 6/12/01
Time: 6:49:45 PM
Remote Name: 209.18.31.111
Jean,
That's not the point.
It doesn't matter whether he was a hitman for the drug lords, the CIA, the military or any other organization. I suspect that he was and there is some evidence to support that suspicion. The point is, you can collect evidence like that until the cows come home without ever finding enough to prove anything. Meanwhile, the process of collecting and correlating that information to build a case against the Colombians, the CIA or whomever, takes you farther and farther away from Fuhrman as the man who committed the killings. Fuhrman is no fool. It is in his best interest to create as much speculation as possible about grand conspiracies (whether they existed or not) that cannot be proven.
When I was in the Army Reserves, I got a security clearance to work in G-2 (division level military intelligence) and I leaned quite a bit about covert operations. They are not nearly as clever as you might think and a lot of the information they gather is pure nonsense. You would not believe how much stumbling and fumbling goes on at all levels.
However, there are some basic techniques that work like magic to cover your tracks. One of the most effective is called "False Flags." You can find all about it in a book called The Spike, which details KGB operations in the United States before the fall of the Soviet Union. It was used mostly to recruit spies and it worked like this: You target someone you want to help you, someone who is virulently anti communist and you feed him plenty of information to convince him that you are, too. Then you "confide" in him, and tell him that you are an agent for the U.S., Canada, Israel or whatever country this person as shown a particular allegiance too and get him to spy for you under THAT country's flag.
Another technique that works extremely well is similar to what bombers and fighter pilots use to confuse heat-seeking missals. It's called "countermeasures." When the pilot detects the missal, he releases hundred of heat-generating objects that fly off in all directions so the missal doesn't know which target to zero in on. A mix of good information with bad information works best.
This is what actually happened in the O.J. Simpson criminal trial. O.J.'s defenders had so much information pointing away from O.J. that they couldn't zero in on any of them, so they went after the most attractive targets and NEVER investigated Mark Fuhrman as a murder suspect. They never investigated his alibi, his shoe size or anything else that could link him to the murders. They had enough evidence from jump to assume it was a drug hit and they went from there to follow the evidence that Fuhrman took pains to create to try to prove that he found both gloves on Bundy and planted one of them on Rockingham. Steven Singular had trouble getting O.J.'s defenders to even listen to what he had on Fuhrman's relationship to Nicole and the test for EDTA because they had TWENTY FIVE THOUSAND leads to sort out and no time to give any of them a thorough going-over. Some of that information could only have come from Fuhrman or Roberts.
Right now O.J. supporters are the best friends he's got because they immediately latch onto whatever information they get that leads away from O.J. You can't frame a man with evidence that proves his innocence. To find the killer you have to get as close as possible to the real evidence that points TO O.J., not away from him, and see who else it fits. Then you have to look at what doesn't fit and see who could be responsible for that. THEN you have to see who matches ALL of it. If you can find one person who does, that has to be the killer. There is ONE person who fits all of it, including the "false flags" and "countermeasures" (red herrings) that were required to draw attention away from him. That person is Mark Fuhrman. --Jasper