[ Home | Contents | Search | Next | Previous | Up ]
From: charlie
Date: 5/11/01
Time: 7:59:41 PM
Hey Jasper, Good to have you back.
Some of the errors in Lee's book can be explained that way--typos, etc. but not all.
Saying that Fung was the one who put the blanket over NIcole is one not so easily explained.
Photos? Not as good as the ones from the other cases and many of the PHotos from OJ come from Lee's own lab--so they were HIS photos.
My biggest objection to the book is that it is basically a rehash with no new material. By no new material--he told none of the civil trial discoveries.
And he kept his criticisms in line so that no police department would get mad with him and NOT HIRE him.
And the format of the book has imaginary characters he talks to and meets with and he travels in time. Another 'excuse' for anybody who wanted to, to dismiss what he has to say.
And the book is very UNscientific. Anybody reading it to gain forensic or scientific knowledge is flat out of luck.
charlie