[ Home | Contents | Search | Next | Previous | Up ]
From: charlie
Date: 4/24/01
Time: 12:10:29 PM
Jean, If I understand the article you sent me correctly, the Atlanta police used ANIMAL blood as probable cause for a search warrant claiming Brown was wounded. Brown did not have a mark on him when arrested. Now that blood evidence is missing?
Humm.... Didn't I just mention ANIMAL blood?
The officer tells this in such a way as to say he knew it was animal blood when they used it as probable cause.
Probable cause can also be a combo of the victim's blood collected with an eyedropper from the large blood pool.
charlie