[ Home | Contents | Search | Next | Previous | Up ]
From: charlie
Date: 4/8/01
Time: 6:33:38 PM
Yes, there is a pattern of this whole scenario being backed up in time.
I was going thru old email and articles today and found some interesting things.
Like Denise Pilack (sp) telling the newspaper that she heard the dog barking at 12. (Didn't she testify?)
That the dog was found with a leash and how the neighbors said Nicole was in the habit of walking the dog and they thought she was doing that when she got attacked.
How the bodies weren't found until after 12 not the prior to 12 we heard later.
How the blind date couple (esp the woman) originally said that they walked by at 11:30 and that only changed after the credit card receipt showed up. Said she looked at her watch at the Mezz at 10:50.
The ice cream store clerk originally said 10:30 and only changed his mind to between 9 and 10 after he was told he Had to be wrong because she was dead by then.
The public domain info of Nic and the Browns leaving around 9 got moved back to 8:30 --and no earlier only because it wasn't possible for it to be earlier or much earlier. (because of the credit card receipt and bill I think)
There is an entire pattern of everything moving back in time. Sure some of these folks could have been wrong about the time being later--but it is not logical to believe that they were ALL wrong and ALL wrong about it being earlier not later.
Or the OWNER of the Mezz stating that Nicole called about her OWN glasses being left.
When you put it together---everything got moved back--sometimes way over an hour.
A pattern. charlie