[ Home | Search | Next | Previous | Up ]
From: charlie
Date: 9/18/00
Time: 9:32:51 AM
Follow up:
If Dick Wagner's site is correct at all that there are 11 feet between the first and second blood drop---that representation is bogus.
We must remember that these photos that Goldberg used were the BEST and it was the FIRST time that Dr. Lee such good pictures and SAYS so for all to hear (tv audience and jury).
In Vannatter's book, he says he can see a blood trail beside the footprints from his location at the front door. (the trail that we were told of--this is impossible). In fact, he says the 5 blood drops. I thought he was just lying about this but now I am not too sure. I believe that there may have been in fact more blood drops than we were told of.
And if DR. LEE didn't see the BEST photos of the prints and drops until nearly the end of the trial, perhaps others didn't see these EXCELLENT shots either.
Remember, 2nd and 3rd generation prints were used with Lee and perhaps with others. AS we learned in the civil trial, what looked like smears in those prints were actually 7 blood drops out the front turning South.
And we have discussed how much the photos were cropped and not grounded to points of reference in the crime scene.
I truly think that there were more blood drops (perhaps blood slung away from shoes, clothes, knife) but they "cherry picked" 5 and called them OJ's. Or since THEY were the perfectly round ones, the were planted there in the first place. The roundness of them distingishing them from the others so those would be the ones "tested".
They aren't necessarily OJ"s blood either. Just 5 perfectly round drops "picked' out of the others that were there.
I sure hope the photos I attempted to make of this comes out.
charlie