[ Home | Search | Next | Previous | Up ]
From: Jean
Date: 9/17/00
Time: 12:08:58 PM
There are 3 explanations for Deja Vu. One is precognitive dream, past life experience, and psycological clues. Lets say you walk into a room and you feel that you have been in this room before, but know that you have not. Now if you were in a similar room in the past that had x things that were the same and you see the same x things then you believe it is the same room. Say the wall paper is the same, window in the same place with white draps, a dark couch, etc. but everything else is different, you register the sameness but not the differences. This seems to be something that the prosecution has used to their advantage. Remember wasn't there a psycologist or psychiatrist that was on the team that was mentioned in some of the testimony. I think the defense said that he had prepared Fuhrman. A good psychologist would have known about this phenomenon and how to use it. Even the black eye that people though she got in 89. You have two pictures one that has a black eye, then a witness says she has a black eye in the picture that worong and then a few pundants say it, your mind believes that you saw a black eye on the 89 photo. They used this also with Lee's footprints, making you believe that the only extra footprint was the one in the concrete. I would guess that if we went back and watched the trial with what we know now that we would see this method used over and over. I have a hunch that some of the best lawyers know how to do this instintively. But this may have been a case of well ploted method of misleading the viewers. I would guess that many people also think that the 92 911 tape is really the 89 911 tape. I bet they hung them together is such a way as to make then seem the same. Especially for people who only watched dips and dabs of the trial. Advertising people, movie people, etc would know exactly how to give these illusions. I think lots went on that we are only now becoming aware of. More suttle than the blackening of time picture, but to do the same. Lets say that you believe that OJ got away with murder and you have a touch of "rich" envy, how mad do you think that all those pictures of OJ on the golf course and his kids in private schools, and his going into expensive resturants. Then we have all the talk about him living high on the hog, and yet not paying the poor victums. It is still going on.