[ Home | Search | Next | Previous | Up ]
From: charlie
Date: 9/5/00
Time: 9:48:08 AM
Pat, I didn't mean to imply that Bosco wouldn't follow where the evidence led him---away from OJ.
What I meant was that if two explanations could be made from one piece of evidence, I think the natural and normal thing would be to lean towards a preconceived idea.
Also, as Jasper says, sometimes a piece of evidence or a fact means nothing to us if we are of a certain mindset. It is something that we might overlook especially if it is small and has no meaning to us in our state of mind.
It is always good to have other minds looking at the same info. That is why Chris Springer had me "edit' his book before he sent it to the publisher.
I just wish that some of Jasper's editors (I take blame too) had pointed out for example that he had Heistra in the wrong place. Sometimes it is just a matter of not having the facts straight. Jasper thought when I first started posting here that the last blood drop and the change was in the garage. It was just a misconception (easily done since the cops did go out of their way to disguise much of the evidence and give the "wrong" impression about it).
I do it myself. I forget (boy do I forget) or have it pictured a certain way in my mind. It takes others conferring to get it straight.
I meant no disrespect towards Bosco at all. I just wonder has he ever thought that all of this is BIGGER than just Kardashian and Wasz? That it has the markings of a covert operation especially with Wasz's background.
If he isn't prepared to consider THAT I think he is missing out on some perhaps important clues.
charlie